AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Ahmad Alshawa

CHEMISTRY · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you will attend consistently, use tutoring, and chase for chemistry.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra Credit AvailableMixed ClarityTough Grader TagLecture HeavyParticipation Counts
  • One student calls him amazing and earned an A+ with and limited graded items.
  • , and hard-to-follow lectures.
  • Experience appears format-sensitive and inconsistent across two recent reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

and few graded items help, but a and harder online comments keep the A from feeling free.

In-person reports A+ with ; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Chemistry content is moderately hard, with lecture-heavy examples some students struggle to follow.

In-person difficulty is moderate; online feels harder and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

28/100

as mandatory and one and sometimes takes it twice.

; online adds confusion about enforcement.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

One strong yes and one non-committal mixed review leave recommendation hanging on format and tolerance for lecture style.

In-person is enthusiastic; online is hesitant.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and few graded items help some students, but others tag him as a .

Format shift

; online signals tougher grading.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload centers on lectures, labs, participation, and limited graded .

Format shift

Online highlights lecture-heavy pace; in-person stresses few graded items.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

Praise for being amazing and limited help.

Format shift

In-person teaching praised; online teaching clarity criticized.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Tags , and few graded items rather than one pure exam track.

Format shift

Both formats mention ; online also notes labs and lectures.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and grading based on few items, ending in an A+.

Main concern

Sample is only one short positive review.

What students said

“For me, Professor Ahmad was amazing”
chemistry

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and hard-to-follow examples.

Main concern

, and limited help on basic questions.

What students said

“His accent can make lectures hard.”
chemistry
“He wont answer basic questions,go to tutoring”
chemistry

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; labs and lecture-based work dominate the picture.

LabsExtra CreditLecture HeavyParticipation

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and mainly supports plus limited graded items.

EXTRA CREDITGraded by few things
“For me, Professor Ahmad was amazing”
chemistry

Online

Online comments mention labs starting when he arrives and .

LabsLecture HeavyTough Grader Tag
“ .”
chemistry

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“For me, Professor Ahmad was amazing”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 mixed-format chemistry reviews with limited detail. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️

52/100

“He says he has "bad impressions" of students who leave early.”

🧪 Teaching Clarity

60/100

“Spends alot of time using examples that are difficult to understand.”

🎯 Path

56/100

“For me, Professor Ahmad was amazing”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • For me, Professor Ahmad was amazing
  • His accent can make lectures hard.
  • Spends alot of time using examples that are difficult to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He wont answer basic questions,go to tutoring
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only two brief conflicting reviews across formats limit reliability.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

chemistry2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1