AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Eman Shweikeh

CHEM151 · CHEM105 · CHEM101LAB · CHEM10 · CHEM101 · CHEM104 · CHEM150 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
59.09%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take Shweikeh if you will use her study guides and ; skip if you need a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizingStudy Guides Match ExamsUnorganized at TimesCaring Yet BluntLab Attendance Critical
  • Many students love her study guides handouts and As with work.
  • A large minority call her unorganized rude when questioned and .
  • Labs and exam preparation activities matter a lot and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

and many report As but students and study not coast.

; in-person stresses study guides plus consistent work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Intro chem is made clearer by her notes yet still requires real study and is not free knowledge.

Both formats describe manageable but real chemistry content.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and missing labs or class can seriously hurt the grade.

and in-person reports.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

and equally loud critics of organization and tone.

; online is one positive one strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

while others report inconsistency and regrade delays.

Format shift

; online mentions and easy exams.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

but and prep activities carry heavy grade weight.

Format shift

Both formats stress labs and .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

and caring moments clash with disorganization rudeness when questioned and lost assignments.

Format shift

In-person sample is large and mixed; online is small and also mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Multiple exams study-guide prep and .

Format shift

Exam and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

strong praise for study guides and clarity versus frustration over disorganization and blunt responses.

Main concern

Unorganization syllabus changes and and older reviews.

What students said

“Before every each exam she gives you a study guide that actually most of it comes on the exam!”
CHEM101
“The .”
CHEM105
“Great professor, I would take her again. .”
CHEM101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online feedback and a very negative report of no email help during remote instruction.

Main concern

One online student said she ignored emails and disliked being questioned during lecture.

What students said

“4 exams, give tons of extra credits. , but .”
CHEM105
“She DID NOT answer to any of my emails for help. 0/5”
CHEM150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

used though organization of dates and parts can be messy.

Study Guides Similar to ExamsExtra Credit SometimesSplit Online and In-Person Exam PartsLabs Critical

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; one report notes two-part exams online plus in person.

Study Guides Match ExamsExam Prep ActivitiesTwo-Part ExamsLab Points Heavy
“Before every each exam she gives you a study guide that actually most of it comes on the exam!”
CHEM101
“Her exams are broken up into 2 parts (one portion online and the other in person).”
CHEM151

Online

Online but do not clearly prove proctoring tools.

Multiple ExamsExtra CreditEasy Exams
“4 exams, give tons of extra credits. , but .”
CHEM105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Before every each exam she gives you a study guide that actually most of it comes on the exam!”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews capturing the polarizing study-guide strength versus organization complaints. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“This professor honestly is one of the . She knows chemistry inside and out.”

📋 Organization Issues

35/100

“She is so unorganized and ; the ”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“You either love or hate her.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She goes over the material step by step, writes on the board, and and worksheets.
  • She may come off as mean but trust me, if you put in your work, you'll earn your grade.
  • and gives you an exam activity to help prepare for the exam.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Organization & Tone

  • The .
  • She gets irritated when asked questions and get angry if you don't understand.
  • Will make petty comments if you are behind in .

Theme 3

📈

  • easy A if u study.
  • Missing a .
  • guide that looks exactly like the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

85/100

Evidence confidence

38 reviews over many years with rich detail and a stable love-hate split give strong confidence in the mixed pattern.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 58
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 510

Course coverage

CHEM10122 reviews
CHEM1507 reviews
CHEM1054 reviews
CHEM1512 reviews
CHEM101 review
Show 2 more courses
CHEM101LAB1 review
CHEM1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 1 · A 9 · A- 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Rather not say 1