AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Lenord Lopez

PHIL101 · PHI101 · PHIL103 · PHIL102 · PHIL105 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
55.56%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you need engaging philosophy lectures and will aggressively document submissions and deadlines.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyAmazing LecturesHilariousCommunication RiskEasy PapersGrading Nightmares
  • Older reviews rave about funny, fascinating lectures and an Easy A with light paper work.
  • Recent reviews report Incomplete grades, ignored emails, and .
  • Workload is often light, but grade reliability and response time are major risks.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Many students say show up, discuss, write two papers, and get an A, though .

; online has both A+ and Avoid-if-you-want-an-A notes.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Material is made relatable and light for most, with and short paper loads.

Both formats mostly describe accessible philosophy; online .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

72/100

as not mandatory, though some still advise showing up for discussion.

; a few online and later in-person mark yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Classic students call him a favorite, but recent communication and Incomplete grade horror stories pull the .

In-person older reviews are glowing; online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Papers and can feel easy, yet misgraded finals and year-long Incomplete cases destroy trust.

Format shift

Leniency is common in older in-person comments; .

Workload

Light

78/100

Often just light reading plus one midterm and .

Format shift

Light load is consistent historically; one and unclear.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Lectures can be outstanding and hilarious, but modern communication and .

Format shift

In-person lectures get the praise; online suffers from structure and response issues.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Grades usually hinge on a few papers, quizzes, and a .

Format shift

; online also mentions quizzes, finals, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In person he is often called hilarious and brilliant, with and easy papers, but a and Incomplete disasters.

Main concern

Recent grade-entry and communication failures despite easy content.

What students said

“He was very funny and made the material very easy to understand. I 1000% percent recommend him.”
PHIL101
“ended with an F because he didn't correctly .”
PHIL102
“Easy A. Loved this professor like everyone else.”
PHIL105

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

one A+ with quick clarification, others report , and Incomplete outcomes.

Main concern

and slow or .

What students said

“The Canvas pages were all over the place & . There were no grade updates so you have no idea how you're doing.”
PHIL101
“once I reached out to the professor, he was quick to clarify the issue”
PHIL102
“He never responded to emails, class was still on so long and .”
PHIL101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is usually a small set of exams.

Essay papersTake-home tests mentionedFew graded itemsExtra credit paper

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In and final essay papers dominate, with occasional rewrite or options.

Midterm paperFinal paperExtra credit paperTake-home tests
“You have 1 midterm paper and 1 final paper.”
PHIL105
“ but not ”
PHIL103
“only 2 easy papers required for class”
PHIL105

Online

Online reviews emphasize papers and .

Long papersUnclear assignmentsFew grade updates
“papers were so long and . Avoid if you are trying to get an A.”
PHIL101
“Critical Thinking and Writing was a great class with some fascinating topics.”
PHIL102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A true practitioner of the socratic method. Show up, speak your mind, read a little, get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, contrasting beloved lectures with and . Credibility rating: High.

🎭 Lecture Energy

85/100

“His lectures are the .”

🟢 Easy A History

80/100

“Easy A if you TRY!”

🚨 Communication Crisis

15/100

“I've been emailing this guy for and not exaggerating. A year and a half.”

📋 Grade Reliability Risk

25/100

“ended with an F because he didn't correctly .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • hands down one of the
  • He was very funny and made the material very easy to understand
  • A true practitioner of the socratic method

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easy A. Loved this professor like everyone else
  • and final
  • real easy to pass

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication and Admin

  • He's horrible at communication
  • The
  • He never responded to emails

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three reviews spanning 2011-2025 show a .

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

PHIL10510 reviews
PHIL1016 reviews
PHIL1023 reviews
PHIL1033 reviews
PHI1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 2