AI Rate Professor

Biology

Ellen To

BIO · BIOL251 · BIOSCI250 · BIO250 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you thrive with and can actively chase help; many students call the experience beyond bad.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest-heavy labsUnapproachableSelf-taught practicalsPolarized anatomy
  • two A students praise help and , three slam unhelpful teaching and brutal lab practicals.
  • Negative reports cite 43/135 practical averages, attitude on laptop, and minimal lab guidance.
  • Success seems to require constant questions and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even supporters say anatomy is pure memorization, while critics report very low practical averages and .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Students frame the class as difficult memorization with and limited guidance.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

as mandatory, though one marks it optional.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

and three of five reviews are scathing about help, averages, and attitude.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Tough grader and averages reported.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Anatomy memorization plus stressful lab practicals make the course feel demanding and high-pressure.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

A minority find her helpful and engaged, but more students describe no help, unapproachable style, and weak teaching experience.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews emphasize lab practicals, tests, and .

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All five reviews are in person and deeply split, with praise for responsive mentoring on biol251 and severe criticism of , and unapproachable labs.

Main concern

and guidance during labs is described as minimal.

What students said

“The average for the lab practical was a 43/135, this shows you the type of teaching style she has. Beyond bad, beware!”
BIO250
“ , and support during practicals was minimal.”
BIOSCI250
“if you do your work and ask her questions, you'll get a good grade”
biol251

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment and heavy testing with little cushion for mistakes.

Lab practicalsTest heavyLow practical averagesTough grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and test-heavy evaluation with limited support.

Lab practicalsTest heavyTough grader
“The average for the lab practical was a 43/135”
BIO250
“anatomy is memorization no matter what and theres no way around it”
biol251

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and I've taken a lot. ... The average for the lab practical was a 43/135, this shows you the type of teaching style she has. Beyond bad, beware!”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews with and split mentoring views. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Teaching Quality

28/100

“Very difficult class due to limited guidance and an .”

📉 Recommendation Risk

24/100

“Bad, she is no help.”

🧪

28/100

“The average scores on lab practicals were extremely low, which made the course stressful.”

🙋 Minority Positive Path

70/100

“if you do your work and ask her questions, you'll get a good grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has the least amount of experience teaching and it shows
  • the instructor also came across as unapproachable
  • she was great, answered all the questions asked

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Test heavy
  • anatomy is memorization no matter what

Theme 3

🧪 About Labs

  • support during practicals was minimal
  • average for the lab practical was a 43/135

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

and thin detail overall limit reliability.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

biol2512 reviews
bio1 review
BIO2501 review
BIOSCI2501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Rather not say 2