AI Rate Professor

Reading

Jacquelyn Ford

REA102 · READ015 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid for REA102; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnprofessionalVague AssignmentsTough GraderHard to ContactCourse Chaos
  • Most recent REA102 reviews call her unorganized, vague, and unprofessional.
  • Students report , and .
  • An older READ015 review is positive, so experience may depend heavily on course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Most recent students struggle for strong grades, though one older READ015 review called it an easy A.

Online REA102 is hard to score high in; the easy-A claim is from older in-person READ015.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

as advanced, but vague expectations make it feel harder than it should.

Online and recent in-person REA102 feel harder; older in-person READ015 felt easy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Some sections list mandatory attendance, others do not, with .

Online and in-person reports both mix mandatory and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Five of six reviews warn students away, especially for REA102.

Online REA102 is nearly all avoid; only older in-person READ015 is positive.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and complaints about opinion-based low scores dominate recent reviews.

Format shift

Harsh grading is mainly Online REA102; older in-person READ015 sounded more lenient.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of homework, papers, and punish delays.

Format shift

Workload pressure is stronger in recent Online and in-person REA102 than in older READ015.

Teaching experience

Poor

20/100

Students cite unprofessionalism, outdated info, poor communication, and .

Format shift

Online REA102 is consistently poor; one older in-person READ015 review is excellent.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and tests or locked finals all appear in student comments.

Format shift

Online and in-person REA102 both mention graded responses and tests; format detail is limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

REA102 is chaotic, while older READ015 was welcoming and easy.

Main concern

Recent REA102 organization and locked deadlines.

What students said

“ . Difficult to contact. Vague and .”
REA102
“Took READ 015 and the professor was great! Very welcoming and easy going. Class is an easy A.”
READ015

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online REA102 reviews are harshly negative on clarity, professionalism, and .

Main concern

, and little support.

What students said

“ . she is rude and unprofessional. Doesn't care about her students and if they pass.”
REA102
“ and expects you to figure it out.”
REA102
“ . This class should not be as hard as she is making it.”
REA102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Students report locked finals and modules after start dates, plus vague expectations that .

Locked FinalsLocked ModulesTough GradingFew Rubrics

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person REA102 mentions locked modules and finals after start dates; READ015 .

Locked ModulesLocked FinalsTest Heavy
“Locked modules after the start date. .”
REA102

Online

Online reviews stress vague instructions and ; they do not clearly prove webcam or Lockdown Browser.

Vague AssignmentsTough GraderNo Clear Rubrics
“doesn't provide rubrics. all her information is outdated and wrong.”
REA102
“she asks for and if she does not agree, she will give you a low grade.”
REA102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . she is rude and unprofessional. Doesn't care about her students and if they pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting REA102 chaos versus one older easy READ015 experience. Credibility rating: Medium.

💢 Teaching Quality

20/100

“ . Difficult to contact.”

🚫 Recommendation

18/100

“ ! She is very vague.”

⚖️

22/100

“ your opinion (reading responses) and if she does not agree, she will give you a low grade.”

🧩 Course Organization

18/100

“Locked modules after the start date. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • rude and unprofessional
  • and expects you to figure it out
  • Very welcoming and easy going

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she is very tough and full of critiques
  • This class should not be as hard as she is making it
  • Class is an easy A

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • Vague and
  • Locked modules after the start date
  • doesn't provide rubrics

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews are detailed and mostly aligned on REA102 problems, but the sample is small and one older course is very different.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

REA1025 reviews
READ0151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1