AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Amanda Psychology

PSYCH118 · PSY105 · PSYCH105 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you thrive teaching yourself from the textbook and , and group work without much instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo Lectures OnlineTough GraderGroup Project DominantExtra Credit LifelineSelf-Teach Heavy
  • Online sections often mean no , and quizzes.
  • and large point hits for missed work.
  • Some students still earn As with , and late-work leniency in better sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

can rescue grades, but , and self-teaching make a clean A unreliable.

Online has D/D+ disasters and one A gem; in-person reports As with heavy .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

Content difficulty is average, but lack of teaching and volume of , and .

Online feels harder due to ; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Multiple reviews mark attendance mandatory or .

Both online and in-person include mandatory or high-stakes participation expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Forty percent would-take-again and strong complaints about no teaching and .

; in-person is mixed with one no and one yes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Tough grader reports include large final-grade deductions and sections.

Format shift

Online shows harshest grading; .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of , and large group project shares.

Format shift

Online and and group loads.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Several students report and pure self-teaching, while and care in better terms.

Format shift

Online quality swings from 1 to 5; in-person lands at average 3s.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and fairly easy exams depending on section.

Format shift

Online leans quizzes and discussions; in-person adds presentations and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and tons of , but group work can be 70% of the class and lectures may mix in politics.

Main concern

Heavy group work and personal/political digressions may not fit every student.

What students said

“ . And she gives a TON of . Make sure you do it all!!”
PSY105
“group work is literally 70% of this class & if you can live with that, then you'll be fine.”
PSYCH118

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online experience splits between a stats gem with feedback and late-work acceptance versus courses with zero lectures, harsh deductions, and 4pm deadlines.

Main concern

and punitive grading can tank grades even for experienced online students.

What students said

“Not a single lecture during the 15-week course I took. She just gave us chapters of the textbook to read.”
PSY105
“I've been taking online classes for 2 years and she's the first teacher that wanted work due at 4pm instead of 11:59.”
PSYCH118
“this prof was a real gem. She's understanding, caring, easy to get a hold of, , and accepts late work”
PSYCH105

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes appear standard; friendliness depends on section and is not clearly open-book or proctored in comments.

Weekly quizzesFairly easy examsTest heavy in some sections

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

special proctoring tools.

Fairly easy exams
“ . And she gives a TON of .”
PSY105

Online

Online reviews emphasize weekly quizzes and textbook .

Weekly quizzesTextbook reading
“assigned two discussions (with 2 replies required each and references), and a weekly quiz.”
PSY105

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not a single lecture during the 15-week course I took. She just gave us chapters of the textbook to read.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 mixed online and in-person reviews, highlighting no-lecture risk, grading severity, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Gaps

38/100

“If we had actual lectures or if she taught literally anything (she didn't say one word on anything about the material), the class would be easy.”

⚖️

28/100

“I missed 2 discussion point assignments worth 15 points and she deducted an extra 50 points off of !”

✨ Occasional Gem

70/100

“If .”

👥 Group Work Load

40/100

“group work is literally 70% of this class & if you can live with that, then you'll be fine.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not a single lecture during the 15-week course I took.
  • Her lectures are somewhat short and appropriate for the topic of sex but you might need thick skin.
  • this prof was a real gem.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you have nothing else going on in your life.
  • she gives a TON of . Make sure you do it all!!
  • she's the first teacher that wanted work due at 4pm instead of 11:59

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework, So
  • group work is literally 70% of this class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews from 2019-2025 show clear split between harsh no-teach online terms and milder in-person experiences, so confidence is moderate.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PSY1052 reviews
PSYCH1182 reviews
PSYCH1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values