AI Rate Professor

English

Jeff Partain

ENGLISH015 · ENGL015 · ENG015 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
90%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Strong pick for English if you show up and do the work; weigh the single serious negative review carefully.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny and engagingGreat essay feedbackParticipation mattersClear grading criteriaWriting skill builder
  • Funny, caring English instructor who improves student writing
  • and fair path if you do the work and attend
  • One serious misconduct allegation contrasts mostly strong praise

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Students say do the work and you pass; not effortless, but fair with feedback and .

Mostly in-person evidence; one online review also says show up and do the work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Reading, papers, and , but lectures and scaffolding make writing manageable.

and reading; online review is brief.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

and some call it mandatory; skipping hurts participation and prep.

In-person tags stress participation; online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Nine of ten reviews are glowing with 90% would-take-again; one severe outlier lowers certainty.

Strong praise across in-person and the one online review; the negative review is in-person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

and good feedback help most students pass; one .

Format shift

; negative bias claim is one recent in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Reading, papers, and , but students say work feels doable with his guidance.

Format shift

; online review only notes do the work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students repeatedly call him funny, caring, and excellent at building essay foundations.

Format shift

Excellent praise in both formats; .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Essays, reading, and class work drive the grade more than traditional high-stakes testing.

Format shift

and feedback; online review does not detail exam format.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person ENGL015 students , and writing growth; one recent review alleges bias and misconduct.

Main concern

A recent review alleges inappropriate comments and .

What students said

“ great professor.”
ENGL015
“He gives great feed back. Do the work and you will pass.”
ENG015
“Says "mmm" to girls on social media. And makes inappropriate comment toward students in class.”
ENGL015

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Single online review calls him the and says showing up and doing work earns a pass.

Main concern

Only one online review, so online experience is thinly documented.

What students said

“ If you show up and do the work you will pass”
ENGL015

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and final prep rather than harsh proctored testing.

Essay focusedFinal exam prepClear grading criteriaExtra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person class trains students toward a papers.

Essay focusedFinal exam prepClear grading criteriaExtra credit
“Mr. Partain trains well enough for the .”
ENGL015
“He works you up to the so you're prepared.”
ENGL015

Online

Online .

Do the work to pass
“ If you show up and do the work you will pass”
ENGL015

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Omg, LOVE Prof Partain! I've always been able to write, but I learned the proper foundation of an .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews (9 in-person, 1 online), balancing strong praise with one severe outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He is funny and I loved taking his class.”

✍️

90/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“ .”

⚠️ Serious Concern

15/100

“makes inappropriate comment toward students in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • funny and engaging
  • Interactive, fun to watch, gives good feed back
  • Easy to understand

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Do the work and you will pass
  • If you do your work and attend his class you will be fine
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • incredibly nice
  • really cares for his students
  • cares about his students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

10 reviews with strong positive consistency but limited sample size and one serious conflicting allegation.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGL0156 reviews
ENG0153 reviews
ENGLISH0151 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values