AI Rate Professor

History

Micheal Rounds

HISTORY17 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Evidence is too split and thin to trust; verify current syllabus and teaching style before enrolling.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarized ReviewsMandatory AttendanceTextbook QuizzesDiscusses Exam FormatMixed Workload
  • Only two reviews and they completely disagree on quality and workload.
  • One student and rambling lectures.
  • Another calls him the and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

One student earned a B+ with light work framing, while another got a .

All evidence is from In person history-17 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty ratings and comments swing from easy lectures .

All evidence is In person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Both reviews mark attendance mandatory, and if absent.

All evidence is In person.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One 10/10 recommendation and one teaching-style mismatch leave recommendation evenly split.

All evidence is In person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Too little consistent grade detail beyond one D+ and one B+ under opposite workload stories.

Format shift

All evidence is In person.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Comments conflict between lots of and .

Format shift

All evidence is In person.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

One student finds lectures amazing and caring; another finds rambling and boring.

Format shift

All evidence is In person.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of weekly quizzes, midterm, and things.

Format shift

All evidence is In person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Two in-person history-17 reviews conflict: .

Main concern

is the current norm.

What students said

“Weekly quizzes of roughly 8-10 pages of .”
history-17
“He and is very open as to discussing the format of the midterm and .”
history-17

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam formats appear discussable with the class, but .

Midterm and Final DiscussedWeekly QuizzesTextbook Reading

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and ; weekly textbook quizzes also matter.

Discussed Exam FormatWeekly QuizzesDense Textbook
“He and is very open as to discussing the format of the midterm and .”
history-17
“Weekly quizzes of roughly 8-10 pages of .”
history-17

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor teaching style doesn't work for me. You will get bored if you know your history.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 In person reviews with directly opposing themes. Credibility rating: Low.

🔀 Split Student Experience

50/100

“Professor Micheal Rounds is the .”

📖

30/100

“Weekly quizzes of roughly 8-10 pages of .”

❤️

90/100

“He truly does care about the learning material he teaches and cares about his students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he gets sick and rambles alot
  • Amazing lectures
  • This professor teaching style doesn't work for me

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • He
  • if absent

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two conflicting in-person reviews with opposite quality, difficulty, and workload claims limit confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

history-172 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values