AI Rate Professor

English

Diane Hunter

ENG1 · ENGL102 · ENG102 · ENGLISH015 · ENG101 · ENGL101 · ENG015 · ENGLISH102 · ENG22 · 57 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
23.81%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you already write at a high level and want a brutal workload with no soft landings.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderSo Many PapersHarsh FeedbackHeavy WorkloadAvoid Online
  • Most students call grading extremely strict and
  • Workload is paper- and
  • A minority say she builds strong writers if you already work hard

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Even strong effort often yields middling grades because she is described as extremely picky and perfectionist.

Both online and ; online adds vague instructions.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

20/100

, and university-level expectations make the content and pace feel brutal.

Difficulty is high in both formats, with online organization problems adding extra friction.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Many say you must show up every day and missing class or deadlines is fatal.

; online is more about relentless weekly deadlines than seat time.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

About one in , and most comments urge students to stay away.

Online ; but vocal group who praise rigor.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

even when instructions were followed.

Format shift

Harsh scoring appears in both formats; .

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

So many papers, daily homework, journals, discussions, and .

Format shift

Online stacks multiple weekly writing tasks; in person piles essays, reading, and peer work.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

A few praise growth and office help, but , and unhelpful comments.

Format shift

Negative teaching experience is strongest online; in person is mixed but still mostly poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and reading responses more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats are paper-driven; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

41 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, boring lectures, and mandatory attendance, with a few calling her rigorous but growth-focused.

Main concern

and no second chances can tank GPA even for strong writers.

What students said

“Please do not waste your time taking her class.”
ENG101
“ and unhelpful”
ENGL101
“Bottom line, you get out what you put in.”
ENG015

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are largely negative on organization, vague directions, piled essays, and .

Main concern

and strict scoring make the class feel nightmarish.

What students said

“ .”
ENG102
“All semester, Prof Hunter disregarded the fact that we are living in a PANDEMIC.”
ENG102
“ ”
ENGLISH102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Course risk comes mainly from strict paper grading rather than clearly described proctored exams.

Essay HeavyMidterm MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Details

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and heavy paper grading, without clear evidence of special proctoring software.

Difficult MidtermPaper FocusedStrict Feedback
“mid-term was difficult. and very hard to pass unless your up-to-par with grammar skills.”
ENG015
“This prof expect a lot a lot of work and a lot of and .”
ENG101

Online

Online reviews focus on essays, vague assignment directions, and .

Essay HeavyUnclear DirectionsStrict Grading
“Weekly, she would just throw assignments with 0 understanding of direction and .”
ENG102
“Even if you follow her instructions completely you will be lucky to get a C on any of the essays.”
ENG102

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you want to succeed, because she will have you jump through hoops to try to complete the classes, and her workload is very high compared to other teachers.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and low recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

24/100

“ .... all i can say save yourselves!!!!!!!”

📝

14/100

“She's so and expects only what she believes is English comprehension and writing.”

📚 Workload Overload

12/100

“She gives way too much work, and is way too strict with .”

💬

20/100

“She wrote comments like "what?" and "Huh?" .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are good for putting you to sleep
  • No clarity! Her lectures out you to sleep
  • she teaches her classes at the University level

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Tried my very best to get an A, got a B
  • class average was a D
  • If you value your GPA, Stay Away!

Theme 3

⚠️ and Tone

  • comments on papers are snarky and unhelpful

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

57

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews spanning many years show , and feedback quality.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 515
1 out of 522

Course coverage

ENG10215 reviews
ENG10110 reviews
ENG0159 reviews
ENGLISH0155 reviews
ENGL1014 reviews
Show 4 more courses
ENG12 reviews
ENGL1022 reviews
ENGLISH1022 reviews
ENG221 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

2

B- 2

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 1 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1