AI Rate Professor

Languages

Flannery Wilson

Courses not reported · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

limited conflicting evidence makes her a coin-flip online French choice.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarizing OnlineEasy A ClaimEncouraging or RudeGraded by Few ThingsAttendance Optional
  • Only two online reviews exist and they sharply disagree
  • One student calls French 101 an easiest A with supportive teaching
  • The other calls her monotone, rude, and a waste of time

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

One detailed review calls it the easiest A ever after grasping basics, with .

All evidence is online only; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Positive review says the class was smooth after basics; the negative review frames difficulty as teaching attitude, not content depth.

Evidence comes only from online French 101 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

as not mandatory for the online class.

; no in-person data.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

One student would 100 percent retake her and one effectively warns off after half an hour.

Split recommendation comes entirely from two online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Graded-by-few-things and easiest-A language suggest forgiving grading for students who get the basics.

Format shift

and based on a tiny sample.

Workload

Light

68/100

Positive review describes smooth sailing once basics clicked, with no report of heavy daily grind.

Format shift

Workload comments exist only for online sections.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

one finds her encouraging and and disengaged.

Format shift

All teaching judgments are from online reviews only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments mention lectures, tests, and limited graded items without a .

Format shift

Assessment detail is sparse and online-only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and pronunciation help; the other says she was lazy, rude, and discouraging on day one.

Main concern

Teaching warmth and difficulty reports completely conflict with .

What students said

“Easiest A I've ever had.”
01-101
“She was monotone, rude ... and seemed just so lazy.”
01-101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Limited comments suggest flexible test .

Understanding on TestsFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online ; no webcam, lockdown, or closed-book proof appears.

Understanding on TestsNo Proctoring Mentioned
“Professor Wilson was also understanding when .”
01-101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would 100% retake her class. Easiest A I've ever had.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting polar opposite online experiences. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Split Teaching Views

48/100

“She was willing to help out with the pronunciations during lectures. Very encouraging.”

⚠️ Warning Review

20/100

“after just 30 minutes into the class i realized it was such a waste of resources.”

🅰️ Easy Grade Claim

78/100

“Easiest A I've ever had.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very encouraging
  • She was monotone, rude
  • seemed just so lazy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Easiest A I've ever had
  • Her class wasn't difficult once you grasped the basics
  • Graded by few things

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only two recent online reviews with opposite tones give low confidence for any firm conclusion.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

01-1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values