AI Rate Professor

Accounting

G Litel

ACCT201 · ACCT010 · ACCT090 · ACCT200 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take him if you want a , but expect and some trickier tests.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPatient CPA MentorHelpful Outside ClassOnline Homework FrictionTrick QuestionsFair But Demanding
  • , and willing to re-teach until concepts click.
  • Homework and online .
  • Great if you want real accounting learning; mixed if you want pure flexibility.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Some finish with A, but reported grades also include B+ and C and several say tests and .

Online has one easy-feeling A and one flexible-but-stressed A; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Accounting content is real and can be hard, though and reviews until students get it.

In-person comments call ACC-200 hard; online difficulty ratings stay lower.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

; older in-person notes rarely discuss skipping.

; in-person evidence is sparse.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Most praise learning and help, but and scheduling or .

Recent online is split yes/no; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

, and grades for learning, but trick items and software issues sting.

Format shift

In-person mentions occasional dropped questions; and fairness.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and online software adds friction.

Format shift

In-person and older comments stress long homework; one online review complains about last-minute due dates.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students repeatedly call him patient, sharp, experienced as a CPA, and willing to stay after class.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is strong; online is more about accessibility and communication.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and formal tests all matter, with tests carrying real weight.

Format shift

Both formats mention tests and homework; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students mostly praise clear lectures, extra help, and fairness, with and .

Main concern

and long multi-part problems can frustrate even strong students.

What students said

“If but very fair if no one gets a question he review until everyone gets it.”
ACCT200
“ had SIX Sections”
ACCT200
“ ; they tended to have a lot of trick questions”
ACCT200

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students split between praising flexibility with communication and criticizing last-minute deadlines that hurt schedule flexibility.

Main concern

Inconsistent test and online.

What students said

“Really great professor gives his personal time for the success of his students.”
ACCT010
“If you're taking online for flexible scheduling, this will be difficult for you.”
ACCT090

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests can include trick always/never items, but he reviews and .

Trick QuestionsTest ReviewsHomework Credit For AttemptsOccasional Dropped Items

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; he reviews tests and .

Trick QuestionsTest ReviewPossible Dropped QuestionNo Final In One Easy Section
“ ; they tended to have a lot of trick questions, and a lot of "always" or "never" hidden in them.”
ACCT200
“he will review the test and ”
ACCT010
“Very easy class. ”
047

Online

Online complaints focus on inconsistent test and .

Inconsistent Test SchedulingLast-Minute Due Dates
“Inconsistent scheduling of due dates”
ACCT090

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If but very fair if no one gets a question he review until everyone gets it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, balancing strong teaching praise with homework and test friction. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“ and will make sure you understand what is being taught.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“ had SIX Sections, it was so long it was like a roll of toilet paper.”

👍 Recommendation Split

68/100

“I highly suggest him as a professor for your accounting classes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and you dont understand like me stay after class
  • and helpful
  • gives his personal time for the success of his students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This class ACC-200 is hard but Mr. lithe make so easy
  • Still got an "A" by the grace of God, but was sweating it

Theme 3

💻 About Online Friction

  • There's also problems with the online software
  • Last minute notifications of
  • If you're taking online for flexible scheduling, this will be difficult for you.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews span 2006-2024 with useful detail, but many older sparse comments and .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCT2005 reviews
ACCT0102 reviews
ACCT0902 reviews
0471 review
ACCT2011 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values