AI Rate Professor

Religion

Julius Jackson

RE70 · PHIL101 · RELIG110 · RELIG176 · RELIG101 · PHIL103 · ANTHRO110 · RELIG100 · PHIL105 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
87.5%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you can handle steady weekly writing and quizzes.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear expectationsWeekly papersFair gradingLots of writingParticipation matters
  • and quizzes
  • if you meet length and keep up with participation
  • Most students recommend him; a few find certain philosophy sections hard

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Do the weekly , and participation and most students land A/B+ ranges.

Online and ; PHIL103 online is harder than most sections.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Many courses are opinion writing and vocab quizzes; content is manageable though .

Online anthro/religion feel easier; some philosophy and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

52/100

Participation matters and missing weekly work hurts, but pure seat-time is not always strict.

; online success depends on weekly participation.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

About 87.5% would take again and , and fair online.

Recommendation is strong in both formats, with isolated hard-class exceptions online.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students repeatedly call grading fair and .

Format shift

Leniency appears in both online and in-person comments.

Workload

Moderate

44/100

, and reading keep the load steady rather than light.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize weekly writing; a few reviews say lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

, and strong online organization dominate the comments.

Format shift

Online praise is especially strong; and knowledgeable.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Weekly papers, discussion boards, and .

Format shift

Both formats .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person and hybrid-style comments , and needing stamina and organization.

Main concern

, and if you fall behind.

What students said

“Papers due every week, varies by 400 - 900 words. .”
RELIG101
“Time management is the key & sleepless nights.”
ANTHRO110
“ . Extremely helpful, and shows tons of interest in getting you to ubderstand the material”
RE70

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online religion, anthro, and and doable with , and forums; PHIL103 is the main hard outlier.

Main concern

Weekly writing volume and occasional hard quiz-heavy sections like PHIL103.

What students said

“Dr. Jackson is probably the .”
PHIL105
“The and the .”
RELIG176
“I don't recommend him for PHIL 103.”
PHIL103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly weekly quizzes and papers with consistent format; no Lockdown Browser or webcam proctoring is mentioned.

Weekly quizzesVocabulary quizzesWeekly papersDiscussion boardsFinal paper

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and quizzes based mostly on vocabulary; proctoring tools are not described.

Weekly papersVocabulary quizzesParticipation
“ .”
ANTHRO110
“Papers due every week, varies by 400 - 900 words.”
RELIG101

Online

Online students describe weekly quizzes, forums, and papers; camera exam.

Weekly quizzesDiscussion boardsWeekly essaysFinal paper
“The final is just 5 pages. He grades on time and .”
RELIG176
“Nail the test. Study and read.”
RELIG100
“You have to take 2 quizzes each week and they are hard.”
PHIL103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dr. Jackson is probably the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews (11 online, 8 in , and high recommendation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“Easiest class and ! J. .”

📝 Workload Reality

44/100

“Papers due every week, varies by 400 - 900 words.”

👍 Recommendation

88/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • prompt to response on any issue
  • Really helped me stay focused and on task

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • always write a page and a half since he likes to grade according to length
  • I don't recommend him for PHIL 103

Theme 3

✍️ About Writing Load

  • SO MANY PAPERS
  • You write a 1 1/2 page each week
  • LOTS of reading and writing

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

19 detailed reviews across many courses and years, with strong agreement on structure, writing load, and overall recommendation.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTHRO1105 reviews
RELIG1014 reviews
PHIL1013 reviews
PHIL1032 reviews
PHIL1051 review
Show 4 more courses
RE701 review
RELIG1001 review
RELIG1101 review
RELIG1761 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1