AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cirilo Nevarez

MATH10202 · MATH103 · MATH95 · MATH108 · MATH102 · MATH096 · MAT095 · MATH095 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
92.31%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

help; be cautious about online sections based on mixed feedback.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaringAmazing lecturesExtra creditPatientNote cards allowed
  • , and student success support
  • Easy A signals appear often with note cards, , and
  • One strong negative online review warns of little teaching and poor communication in that format

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Multiple students report Easy A with note cards and , though effort and mercy still matter and one F appears online.

Easy A language is strongest in person; the failed online MATH103 review is a .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

He makes statistics and lower-level math feel easy and fun for non-math students without removing all challenge.

In-person reviews emphasize simplification; online difficulty comments are mixed and sparse.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory, especially in person.

; one online review reports non-mandatory attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Overwhelming take-him advice for in-person math, tempered slightly .

; online evidence is split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Note cards, abundant , and ; a few note thorough standards remain.

Format shift

Leniency evidence is mainly in person; .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Homework and reading exist and one review notes lots of homework, but support and bonuses reduce pressure.

Format shift

Workload comments are mostly in person; online mentions focus more on missing instruction than volume.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

, and patient; online quality drops sharply in at least one review.

Format shift

Excellent in-person consensus contrasts with one severe online teaching failure report.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and group work all factor into grades.

Format shift

Exam and ; online assessments are poorly described except by the negative review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students overwhelmingly , and supportive with snacks, note cards, and abundant .

Main concern

Some find notebook neatness rules and high-school-style policies unnecessary; handwriting can be hard to read.

What students said

“He allows you to and exam. A lot of opportunities!!”
MATH108
“If you don't understand the material he won't let you fall behind.”
MATH102
“IF !!!!!”
MATH108

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

while another reports almost no teaching, poor communication, and an F.

Main concern

At least one online section offered little instruction, and exams.

What students said

“Very little content is actually taught so you're lost with hw and exams. whatsoever.”
MATH103
“He has a really good way of explaining the material if you don't understand it.”
MATH108

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

support; online exam policies are not clearly proven.

Note cards allowedExtra creditQuizzes and exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report note cards allowed on quizzes and .

Note cards allowedQuizzes and examsExtra credit
“He allows you to and exam. A lot of opportunities!!”
MATH108

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or exams.

“Very little content is actually taught so you're lost with hw and exams.”
MATH103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would absolutely recommend taking his class, it was an EASY A, definitely give him a 10!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting in-person support and online format risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He made Statistics easy and fun. He was very patient specially to those who hadn't been in basic math for a while.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“IF !!!!!”

❤️ Student Support

90/100

“If you don't understand the material he won't let you fall behind.”

⚠️ Online Risk

20/100

“Do not waste you semester. Very little content is actually taught so you're lost with hw and exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • makes lectures interesting
  • Funny guy, lectures are not boring

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it was an EASY A
  • and exam
  • A lot of opportunities!!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • genuinely cares about your success
  • extremely caring
  • He's really chill and caring

Theme 4

💻 About Online Format

  • whatsoever
  • His online format is the worst
  • if you have a tough time with math.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

13 reviews from 2019-2022 with rich detail and strong in-person consistency; online sample is small but includes a critical counterpoint.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1085 reviews
MATH1022 reviews
MAT0951 review
MATH0951 review
MATH0961 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH102021 review
MATH1031 review
MATH951 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1