AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Safieh Ladani

CHEM215LAB · CHEM100 · OCHEM220 · CHEM150 · CHE150 · 24B · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
10%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless no other section exists; .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesTough graderStudy guides mismatch examsLittle feedbackAvoid if possible
  • Most students warn she is a poor lecturer with and unanswered questions.
  • Exams and study guides often do not match, and work is rarely returned with feedback.
  • One summer CHEM100 outlier liked her, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even diligent students report , and exams that do not match preparation.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

High difficulty , and material that students must self-teach.

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and dismiss late arrivals, though a few say no.

Mixed within in-person reviews; overall leans strict.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Nine of and many urge any other professor.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

, and little partial-credit clarity.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

and long finals that students could not finish.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

, and learning mainly from the textbook.

Format shift

One positive summer outlier does not offset the broader pattern.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tags and comments emphasize tests, long finals, and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person chemistry students overwhelmingly , and useless study guides.

Main concern

You may learn little in class and .

What students said

“ . Her lecture is giving out powerpoint print outs and .”
CHEM150
“ .”
CHEM100
“ and moves quicker than the same classes with different professors.”
OCHEM220

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes, often unlike study guides, with and .

Test heavyStudy guides mismatch examsLong finalsLittle returned feedback

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report mismatched study guides, unfinished long finals, and .

Test heavyStudy guides not like testsLong finalNo quiz or exam feedback
“Study .”
CHEM150
“ able to finish it.”
CHEM150
“Never handwork back or let you know and exams.”
OCHEM220

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Her lecture is giving out powerpoint print outs and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Quality

18/100

“She is not a great TEACHER. Beware, you will not learn anything.”

📉 Recommendation

12/100

“ .”

🧪

28/100

“Study .”

📝

18/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Horrible lecturer. .
  • Lectures seem very scattered.
  • because she's just repeats how she explained it the first time.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If .
  • She had an easy lab but .
  • .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Red Flags

  • she uses her phones during class, she sometimes leaves lab for 30 minutes
  • Never handwork back or let you know and exams.
  • She didn't give us one answer the ENTIRE semester

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews from 2016-2021 with highly consistent negative detail and one positive outlier.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHEM1003 reviews
CHEM1503 reviews
24B1 review
CHE1501 review
CHEM215LAB1 review
Show 1 more courses
OCHEM2201 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1