AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Anthony Ababat

ENGR265 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

and if you are stuck in the section.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderUnpreparedWeak content knowledgeConfusing assessmentsNot recommended
  • Student says he lacks statics knowledge and relies on others' PowerPoints.
  • Quizzes and .
  • ; called the professor trash overall.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

and out of reach without self-study.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Material itself is said to be manageable, but ineffective teaching makes learning much harder.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

as .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and describes the experience as a waste of time.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

and said quizzes and tests are graded absurdly.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

40/100

; pain centers on teaching quality and harsh tests.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Accused of almost no subject knowledge and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Criticism focuses on quizzes and tests rather than assignment-heavy learning.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person engineering , and content knowledge lacking.

Main concern

You cannot rely on lectures or fair quiz and .

What students said

“This man is not supposed to be teaching this class. He has barley any knowledge if any at all of statics.”
ENGR265

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments feel strict because quizzes and .

Harsh quiz gradingHarsh test grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person review attacks quiz and .

QuizzesTestsTough grading
“ and tests absurdly. One word to describe this Professor trash!!!!”
ENGR265

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This man is not supposed to be teaching this class. He has barley any knowledge if any at all of statics.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting poor teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“dont rely him teaching you cause it will be a waste of time.”

⚖️

15/100

“ and tests absurdly.”

👎 Recommendation

5/100

“One word to describe this Professor trash!!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • barley any knowledge if any at all of statics
  • Uses other peoples PowerPoints
  • wont solve your questions

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and tests absurdly

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Single highly negative 2021 review provides clear detail but no corroborating sample.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENGR2651 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1