AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Haoxiong (David) Li

PSYCH201 · PSYCH5 · PSYCH10704 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

unless ; online may be easier but evidence is thin.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandSlow email repliesTimed examsOnline easy AUnclear expectations
  • One glowing online review contrasts sharply with three negative in-person reviews
  • Students struggle with accent, slow emails, and
  • Online format can be light with journals and , but sample size is tiny

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

42/100

Online can be an easy A+, but in-person grades cluster around C range with and projects.

Online evidence is highly easy; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content itself is not extreme, but and rushed assessments raise the felt difficulty.

Online called easy; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

and others do not, with little policy detail in comments.

; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Three of and cite communication and .

Online is a strong yes; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

Online offers chances and , but little cushion.

Format shift

Online feels generous; in-person feels strict.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Online work is light journals and ; and a big research project.

Format shift

Online workload is light; .

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Students say lectures are hard to understand, emails are slow, and answers to questions are weak.

Format shift

Online praises lectures; in-person reviews are strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Timed midterms, finals, quizzes from the book, and a .

Format shift

; and project heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students report poor , and weak guidance.

Main concern

Accent, , and .

What students said

“ .”
PSYCH10704
“You can barely understand what he is saying and hardly knows the answers to any of your questions.”
PSYCH10704
“does a terrible job at explaining .”
PSYCH201

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

One online student reports an easy A+ with lectures, journals, , and .

Main concern

Only a single positive online review.

What students said

“Course was easy watch the . !”
PSYCH5

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and poorly aligned; online has a single final with lighter weekly writeups.

Very little time on testsStudy guide mismatchOne final onlineBook-based quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals give very little time, and study guides may not match the tests.

Little time on testsLate study guidesUnaligned tests
“He also gives very little time on mid -terms and final.”
PSYCH10704
“Our study guide had nothing to do with our tests.”
PSYCH10704

Online

Online assessment is journals .

Only one final examWeekly learning writeupsNo quizzes
“ ! the end of each week”
PSYCH5

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and sends you your study guide a day before your mid-term.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting the and communication issues. Credibility rating: Low.

👎 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ .”

🗣️ Communication Barriers

28/100

“You can barely understand what he is saying and hardly knows the answers to any of your questions.”

⏱️

35/100

“He also gives very little time on mid -terms and final.”

🌟 Online Contrast

85/100

“David (Haoxiong) Li at Chaffey College is an amazing Professor!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Clarity

  • You also can't understand him because of his accent.
  • The teacher is hard to understand due to his heavy accent.
  • hardly knows the answers to any of your questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Work

  • !
  • If you read the book you will do well on the quizzes.
  • assigns a

Theme 3

📧 About Responsiveness

  • Professor Li hardly responses to any emails.
  • Understanding if and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews with a sharp online versus in-person split limit confidence in any single conclusion.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYCH107042 reviews
PSYCH2011 review
PSYCH51 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values