AI Rate Professor

Psychiatry

Marcia Wyatt

PSYCH086 · PSYCH085 · SYCH086 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; reviews describe a harsh, discouraging experience with unfair tests and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderPoint-deduction focusedUnfair examsAuthoritative ice queenDiscouraging
  • Near-universal 1-2 quality ratings with
  • and test banks
  • and no path to an A

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Students say nothing is ever perfect enough for an A and .

; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Every review rates difficulty at 5 with , and exam questions pulled from outside sources.

; no online reviews exist.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and enforcement even extended to uniform sock checks.

; no online reviews exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and comments warn future students to stay away.

; no online reviews exist.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Tags and comments call her a and rarely gives full credit.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

, and frequent high-stakes assignments dominate the load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Lectures are called boring and impersonal with ignored raised hands and authoritarian tone.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Exams from outside sources and fair homework credit.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person psych-tech courses feel like boot camp: , and exams test material never covered in class.

Main concern

Punitive grading and even for strong students.

What students said

“Very discouraging and difficult from the beginning of the semester and does not care about students.”
PSYCH086
“No such thing as an A because nothing is perfect for her.”
PSYCH086
“She so you're constantly walking on eggshells.”
PSYCH086

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and test banks and answers are defended without listening to student logic.

Outside test-bank questionsOpinion-based answersNo partial credit cultureIn-person exams

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and arguable opinion-based items that tank even strong students.

Outside test-bank questionsOpinion-based answersHardest exams in program
“ students dont have access to outside of lecture and the required book.”
PSYCH086
“ b/c of arguable ideas and each answer could be argued against the correct one by opinion than facts.”
PSYCH086

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very discouraging and difficult from the beginning of the semester and does not care about students. She so you're constantly walking on eggshells.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews and unfair exams. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Her style is boring, impersonal and AUTHORITATIVE.”

⚖️

10/100

“She but very reluctant to give credit where credit is due.”

📉 Recommendation

5/100

“Good luck to all of her future students!”

📚

22/100

“ but expected to answer new info correctly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • could not stay away in her lectures
  • raised hands ignored sometimes
  • Ice queen #1

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • No such thing as an A because nothing is perfect for her
  • A/B students got C's for overall
  • I never had a class that I would not get a 0 but a (-) score against my overall grade

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness

  • Not fair - very subjective
  • Struggling

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven detailed in-person reviews spanning 2006-2021 show highly , and teaching style.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 55
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PSYCH0868 reviews
SYCH0862 reviews
PSYCH0851 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values