AI Rate Professor

Biology

Rebecca Ramos

BIO250 · ANAT260 · ANATO260 · BIO260 · BIOL260 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid if ; only consider if you can self-teach and grind .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganized LecturesLots of Extra CreditSelf-Study RequiredTest HeavyPoor Structure
  • Lectures often feel unorganized, unclear, or mismatched with tests.
  • Heavy can rescue grades if .
  • Anatomy workload is high; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Abundant and second chances let many students still land strong grades despite weak lectures.

Online and ; is mainly documented in-person.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Anatomy content is dense and memorization-heavy with that force self-teaching.

Both formats describe hard anatomy material; online adds vague packets.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Reviews stress showing up and and success.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students call her unclear or disorganized and .

Online review is strongly negative; in-person is mixed but leans negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

Frequent and multiple chances raise grades even when teaching is weak.

Format shift

theme is strongest in in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Heavy memorization, quizzes, tests, and .

Format shift

Both formats report high effort; online adds vague lab packets.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Repeated complaints of , and tests not matching class.

Format shift

Online review is especially harsh; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and lab work.

Format shift

In-person reviews emphasize book-based tests; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Long-running in-person anatomy pattern of disorganization and weak lectures, offset by heavy and book-based tests for self-motivated students.

Main concern

Teaching quality and organization are widely criticized.

What students said

“horrible. Ms. ”
BIO260
“Super unorganized, not always clear, but gives out a ton of handouts. I .”
ANAT260
“Yes, she gives ALOT of , but honestly, if she was a better teacher I doubt she would need to give extra credit.”
BIO260

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online anatomy review called her highly unorganized with almost no real lectures and .

Main concern

Little actual teaching and vague packets with .

What students said

“ . Used packets for labs which were extremely vague then graded very specifically.”
ANATO260

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; reviews do not clearly prove special proctoring tools.

Book-Based TestsLots of QuizzesExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests are often book-based with many quizzes; softens outcomes.

Book-Based TestsLots of QuizzesExtra Credit
“ .”
BIO260
“ . (so you need it)”
BIOL260

Online

Online evidence focuses on vague lab .

Vague Lab PacketsStrict Packet Grading
“Used packets for specifically.”
ANATO260

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Please do yourself a favor and . You'll be glad you did.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews (1 online, 16 in-person), highlighting disorganization, , and self-study. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“She is the worst! She doesn't know how to teach”

🎁 Lifeline

74/100

“she does care about you passing the class and offers A LOT of ”

📖

78/100

“I . Be sure to read, read, read.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and .
  • at times I thought she didn't even know what she was talking about

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • In my opinion she gives way too many chances to get an A.
  • I got an A no problem.
  • She gives a lot of so there's a lot of room to make mistakes.

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendations

  • SO EVER PLEASE SAVE YOUR SELF
  • Sorry to say, but !
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews spanning many years with highly consistent complaints about organization and teaching quality.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 57
2 out of 51
1 out of 56

Course coverage

BIO2608 reviews
ANAT2602 reviews
ANATO2602 reviews
BIOL2602 reviews
2501 review
Show 2 more courses
2601 review
BIO2501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1