AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Shamsul Arefin

MATH108 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid this professor if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor ExplanationsSurprise Test QuestionsTest HeavyLecture HeavyNot Recommended
  • and
  • and class is test-heavy
  • Single review strongly advises against taking him

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

The only reported grade was an F after a .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students rate the content hard and .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and tags warn that skipping class means you will not pass.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

The and explicitly says not to choose this professor.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Reported F and surprise exam content .

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Test-heavy and lecture-heavy tags indicate a .

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Nice to talk to but tests.

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Tags and comments emphasize tests more than other graded work.

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One in-person student found him pleasant to talk to but a weak and would not take him again.

Main concern

class, making fair prep hard.

What students said

“he doesn't explain very well and he adds questions that were not in the ”
MATH108

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

prior classwork, raising unfair difficulty.

In-Person TestsUntaught Material on ExamsTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests reportedly and quizzes.

In-Person TestsSurprise QuestionsTest Heavy
“he adds questions that were not in the ”
MATH108

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you need to take this .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting weak explanations and unfair tests. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Clarity

28/100

“he doesn't explain very well and he adds questions that were not in the ”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“If you need to take this .”

📝

30/100

“he adds questions that were not in the ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a great professor to talk to, but
  • Lecture heavy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • adds questions that were not in the
  • Test heavy
  • F

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2019 in-person review with limited detail, so confidence in the pattern is low.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1081 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values