Rose Urbanovich

PHIL105 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 91/100
RMP rating: 5.0/5
Take again: 100%
Difficulty: 4.0

The decision

if you want rigorous philosophy that pushes how you think and are willing to write a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerMakes You Think DifferentlyClear Grading CriteriaStrong FeedbackPrepares You for Final Paper

One strong in-person review praises deep, perspective-shifting philosophy work.
Coursework is extensive with , and a .
Attendance was mandatory; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Difficulty is high and a real sustained work.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Material is extensive and forces students to rethink perspectives rather than memorize light facts.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

The .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Student would take her again after the course paid off intellectually and preparation built toward the .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and , but no grade reported and the course is demanding.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Weekly discussions, quizzes, tests, and a light.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

, and coursework that develops real critical thinking.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and a .

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person PHIL105 felt like a smart gamble that paid off with extensive, perspective-shifting work and .

Main concern

and text-based quizzes require steady effort.

What students said

“the material is extensive and her coursework makes you think outside the box and reevaluate what and how you think”
PHIL105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on text quizzes and ultra-easy open formats.

QuizzesTests on TextLarge Final Paper

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests on the text, plus a large final paper.

QuizzesTests on TextLarge Final Paper

“There is a , but all of the coursework before prepares you for it. There is a and ”
PHIL105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“This professor I took on a gamble. But it worked out great, the material is extensive and her coursework makes you think outside the box.”
Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting teaching depth and assessment load. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“the material is extensive and her coursework makes you think outside the box and reevaluate what and how you think”

📝 Assessment Design

55/100

“There is a , but all of the coursework before prepares you for it.”

👍

90/100

“This professor I took on a gamble. But it worked out great”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

makes you think outside the box and reevaluate what and how you think
Accessible outside class

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Assessments

There is a
and
all of the coursework before prepares you for it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2019 in-person review exists, so detail is useful but sample size and recency are weak.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 50

1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1051 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Rose Urbanovich

x x if you want rigorous philosophy that pushes how you think and are willing to write a x x x.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Challenging

Mandatory

MustTake

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

📝 Assessment Design

👍 x x x

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Workload and Assessments

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if you want rigorous philosophy that pushes how you think and are willing to write a .

👍