AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Ayesha Tariq

CHEM105 · CHEM104 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you will attend, study the guides, and want a caring professor who still expects real work.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and HelpfulClear SyllabusExtra Credit AvailableIntense ChemistryTough but Fair Grader
  • Most students call her excellent, caring, and clear if you study and use her guides.
  • CHEM105 is intense with weekly quizzes and long exams; effort is required.
  • A minority report syllabus drift, email lag, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Students report As are reachable with study guides and effort, not free, and some call her a .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Chemistry content is described as hard and intense even when teaching support is strong.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Four of five reviews urge taking her for caring teaching and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Clear criteria and help, but tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Expect , and steady study in an intense combination chemistry sequence.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Majority describe caring, inspirational lectures and .

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Weekly quizzes and and syllabus-driven grading.

Format shift

Based only on in-person evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person chemistry with Tariq is intense but highly praised when students put in work; , and offers .

Main concern

Weekly quizzes, long exams, and .

What students said

“JUST DO THE WORK ( , AND YOU'LL DO FINE.”
CHEM105
“this is a combination chemistry class which is VERY intense but professor Tariq helps you pull through.”
CHEM105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is quiz- and soft-exam format.

Weekly QuizzesLong ExamsStudy GuidesExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

exams, and study guides; reviews do not clearly prove proctoring tools.

Weekly QuizzesLong ExamsStudy Guides
“ and long exams.”
CHEM105
“JUST DO THE WORK ( , AND YOU'LL DO FINE.”
CHEM105

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“JUST DO THE WORK ( , AND YOU'LL DO FINE.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting care, intensity, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Professor Tariq is honestly the ”

❤️ Caring Support

85/100

“She cares about her students passing, so approach her if you're having difficulty with the material.”

⚖️

52/100

“Does not follow syllabus. and long exams.”

👍 Recommendation

78/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Helpful and smart. The !
  • She is so detailed and goes out of the way to help her Students succeed.
  • Shes funny but a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Its chemistry! Its supposed to be hard!
  • this is a combination chemistry class which is VERY intense
  • JUST DO THE WORK ( )

Theme 3

⚠️

  • Does not follow syllabus.
  • her in person
  • and long exams.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five mostly consistent 2018-2019 in-person reviews with mixed grades and one strong negative provide a usable but not deep sample.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM1054 reviews
CHEM1041 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values