AI Rate Professor

Academic Skills Development

Mary Strine

ACAD · ACAD100 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you have any alternative; the workload and harsh grading are not worth a 1-unit course.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderUnorganizedHeavy 1-unit workloadPoor communicationAvoid online
  • Students repeatedly warn against her for a 1-unit class that , and busywork.
  • Communication and organization problems dominate: late posts, outdated materials, typos, and slow or .
  • Would-take-again is effectively zero, with multiple reviews calling her harsh and unhelpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Tough grading, grammar deductions, and low unit count.

Online reviews stress harsh deductions most clearly; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content is academic skills, but volume of , and 1-unit class should.

Online students especially describe overload; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Online participation and required peer .

Online evidence is strongest on forced discussion posts; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students almost uniformly advise against her, with .

; online warnings are especially strong.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Tagged as a and is described as grading way too hard for a skills class.

Format shift

the most detailed.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

For a 1-unit , and late-semester piles of work.

Format shift

Workload complaints are loudest in online reviews but also appear in .

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Students cite unprofessional materials, slow or rude replies, and .

Format shift

, but the rest of both formats are negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and weekly assignments rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Online reviews detail quizzes and posts; and assignment dumps.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person and hybrid-labeled comments still complain , and poor responsiveness, with only one older positive review.

Main concern

Unorganized course materials and .

What students said

“Only gives you a week to complete a lot of work yet takes over a week to grade it.”
00170
“ and ”
ACAD100

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are strongly negative, describing excessive work for one unit, harsh grading, forced peer comments, and .

Main concern

.

What students said

“ ! For a 1-unit class, she gives a lot of reading assignments and quizzes.”
ACAD100
“I would highly advise you to take this class on campus with a different professor. This can definitely be a fun class but NOT ONLINE!”
ACAD

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize quizzes and little evidence of open-book friendliness.

QuizzesReading assignmentsDiscussion postsLate final workload

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

week of work near the end, but do not clearly describe proctoring style.

Final assignmentWeekly workload near end
“she assigned a final and a full weeks workload w/ only 3 class days left.”
ACAD100

Online

Online students report frequent quizzes, required peer comments, and harsh .

QuizzesPeer discussion postsGrammar point deductions
“For a 1-unit class, she gives a lot of reading assignments and quizzes. You MUST comment on other student's posts”
ACAD100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! For a 1-unit class, she gives a lot of reading assignments and quizzes.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting harsh grading, overload, and organization failures. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Rate

12/100

“ ”

📝

18/100

“Also grades way too hard.”

📚 Workload Overload

22/100

“This class is only worth 1 unit and she gives way too much work.”

📂 Organization Issues

20/100

“Her course materials and due dates have not been updated for two years!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching & Tone

  • If you ask her questions via email she is really rude about it
  • SHe told me I had no chance in college and
  • She's the worst.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • lot of reading assignments and quizzes
  • grades way too hard
  • Only gives you a week to complete a lot of work yet takes over a week to grade it

Theme 3

📂 About Organization

  • late
  • Two lectures numbered 4, then straight to lecture 6

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed and consistent negative reviews support the pattern, but the small sample and older dates keep credibility only medium.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACAD1004 reviews
ACAD2 reviews
001701 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values