AI Rate Professor

Humanities

Brenda Miller

HUMSVHUMS · HUMSV · HUMSV183 · HUMSV190 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you will treat class like a job: attend fully and finish every paper; .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture HeavyMany PapersAttendance CriticalPolarizingDo The Work
  • Show up on time, stay the full class, and complete all work for a strong grade.
  • and boring or uncontrolled classrooms.
  • Heavy paper load and lecture-heavy format with little tolerance for skipping.
  • suitableStudentType
  • Effort For Reward

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Students who attend fully and finish all papers report easy As, but the .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Reported difficulty is low, with content described as manageable when students simply show up and work.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Tags and comments stress that skipping class means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

if you work, while others call the class boring or poorly managed.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Comments say on-time attendance and completed work produce good grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students flag lecture-heavy sessions and so many papers.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Praise for and early loss of classroom control.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

and completed .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students say and completed work, but some found lectures boring or the classroom poorly managed.

Main concern

Heavy papers and .

What students said

“If you show up on time, stay the full class, and do all your work you'll get an -A-.”
HUMSV190
“So boring”
HUMSV
“First 2 weeks she lost control of class allowing students to ask questions thqat were not even related to the topic we were on.”
HUMSV183

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews do not .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you show up on time, stay the full class, and do all your work you'll get an -A-.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews spanning 2006-2017, highlighting attendance, papers, and mixed teaching quality. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“She's a really great teacher and .”

📝 Workload Reality

32/100

“So many papers”

🚪

22/100

“Skip class? You won't pass.”

⚖️ Grade Path

62/100

“if your on time and don't leave early do your work than you'll get a good grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's a really great teacher and .
  • So boring
  • you need to teach her class like it's a job

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you show up on time, stay the full class, and do all your work you'll get an -A-.
  • just don't push her buttons show up and do your work

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Control

  • First 2 weeks she lost control of class
  • taking out her frustration on those of us that are there to get an education

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only four mostly old reviews from 2006-2017 with mixed detail and no recent confirmation.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HUMSV1 review
HUMSV1831 review
HUMSV1901 review
HUMSVHUMS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values