AI Rate Professor

Academic Services

Aleida Gordon

FN162NUTRITION · FN162 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

if you will show up, read everything, and ; otherwise skip.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing personalityLots of homeworkParticipation heavyLecture heavyCaring to some
  • Student opinions split hard between caring expert and .
  • , and participation.
  • Workload and communication style are the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is not free; you must finish assigned work, read, show up, and participate consistently.

All evidence is from in-person FN162 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

Content is manageable if you keep up, but ratings and comments still describe high difficulty and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Attendance and participation are treated as .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

, and the negative review is strongly hostile.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and participating can get you through, but there is .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Tags and comments repeatedly flag lots of , and lecture-heavy demands.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

One student praises knowledge and passion while another calls her misleading and a poor communicator.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

, and showing up more than exam talk.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person nutrition sections feel lecture-heavy with mandatory participation and ; .

Main concern

Inconsistent communication and a no-nonsense style that some students read as rude.

What students said

“If you do all your assigned work and show up for class and participate you can pass her class.”
FN162NUTRITION
“Her course is not difficult, you just have to read, participate, and do the homework.”
FN162
“Rude and ridiculous professor She has no understanding of communication , is very misleading”
FN162

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and participation rather than a clearly documented exam policy.

“The so there aren't many excuses as to why one cannot complete the homework.”
FN162

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you do all your assigned work and show up for class and participate you can pass her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews spanning 2016-2017, highlighting split teaching quality and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Professor Gordon is very knowledgeable in her field. She will give you all the tools you need to succeed.”

📚 Workload Reality

28/100

“you just have to read, participate, and do the homework.”

👎 Polarizing Experience

34/100

“Rude and ridiculous professor She has no understanding of communication , is very misleading”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a .
  • Amazing lectures
  • She is very passionate about this.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her course is not difficult, you just have to read, participate, and do the homework.
  • LOTS OF HOMEWORK
  • Get ready to read

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • Rude and ridiculous professor
  • far from a good professor
  • Nothing makes sense

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only three older reviews with mixed detail and no online sample make the signal thin and polarized.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

FN1622 reviews
FN162NUTRITION1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1