AI Rate Professor

English

DeAnna Jensen

ENG101 · ENG015 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid her class unless you have no other option and while .

Best fit · Self Taught ProLoses Student WorkUnorganizedOff-Topic LecturesDoes Not CareAvoid
  • Every review is strongly negative on organization and classroom focus.
  • so students must keep full copies of everything.
  • and criteria are unreliable and learning gains are described as near zero.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Grades from A to C appear but lost work and A unpredictable.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Content itself is not described as advanced; the pain is disorganization and off-topic class time not intellectual rigor.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

while others say it was mandatory yet she was often late or a no-show.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

All four reviewers reject retaking her and call her among the and organization.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

because submitted work can vanish or later be called a boring topic after prior approval.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Papers and books are assigned but reviews focus more on chaos than sheer volume of work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students say she goes off topic is late forgetful admits not caring and teaches almost nothing useful.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on papers and assigned work with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as and unsafe for graded work because papers get lost.

Main concern

Lost papers no-shows and work.

What students said

“Horrible professor. keep track of because she loses them.”
ENG101
“You will not learn a thing! Goes off topic.”
ENG101
“she will lose them or not give you credit for the work did.”
ENG101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize paper assignments and lost .

Paper-Based WorkUnclear Criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

criteria rather than described exams.

Paper-Based WorkUnclear Criteria
“keep track of because she loses them.”
ENG101
“Couldn't even understand her criteria, it sucked so boring”
ENG015

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is the school, very unorganized and forgetful of things.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting lost work off-topic teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“You will not learn a thing! Goes off topic.”

📁 Organization Risk

15/100

“keep track of because she loses them.”

👎 Recommendation

8/100

“Horrible professor.”

📚 Criteria Clarity

20/100

“Couldn't even understand her criteria, it sucked so boring”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She'll go on a tangent about things not even remotely related to English.
  • tells long stories that aren't even associated with the work
  • Told us she didn't care about teaching anymore because she's retiring

Theme 2

📁 About Organization

  • She had difficulty keeping track of papers submitted. SAVE ALL your graded work.
  • she will lose them or not give you credit for the work did
  • Bought all the books she requested and never used them.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades

  • Told me a later on lowered my grade
  • I got a C in her class and only to find out that she did not give me cred for the work I did

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews from one year all negative limits breadth but the agreement on lost work and poor teaching is strong.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENG1013 reviews
ENG0151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values