AI Rate Professor

Aerospace Studies

Robert Johnson

ASTROLAB · ASTRO125 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Avoid unless required; and students report struggling to follow him.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMonotone LecturesHard to FollowTough GraderGroup ProjectsLecture Heavy
  • Lectures are dry and for most students
  • Lab work and group projects drive the course load
  • Very low quality ratings and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Tagged as and little clarity on how to earn top marks.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

High difficulty ratings and make the material feel hard to grasp.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

; quality ratings are very low and lectures are .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

though one comment called him fair but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lab reports and required group projects add substantial out-of-class work.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Students say lectures are monotone, dry, and hard to understand.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Emphasis on lab reports and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person students find lectures monotone and ; lab reports and group work are the main workload.

Main concern

and difficulty staying engaged in class.

What students said

“Not sure what he is talking about in class. Hard to pay attention, monotone.”
ASTRO125
“Only a few knew what he was saying. Work in groups, it is hard to do it alone.”
ASTRO125

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews focus on labs and lectures; .

“Do the lab reports. Does not seem like he reads them.”
ASTRO125

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Not sure what he is talking about in class. Hard to pay attention, monotone.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting lecture clarity and workload. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Clarity

22/100

“Not sure what he is talking about in class. Only a few knew what he was saying.”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“No”

📚 Workload Style

35/100

“Work in groups, it is hard to do it alone.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hard to pay attention, monotone
  • Dry humor
  • Just difficult to follow his little lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Work

  • Do the lab reports
  • Work in groups, it is hard to do it alone

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two sparse reviews spanning 2009-2016, one with no comment body.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ASTRO1251 review
ASTROLAB1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1