AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Jessica Jordan

PSYCH111 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

review; lectures and tests were poorly aligned.

Best fit · Self Taught ProReads from slidesIrrelevant testsGets sidetrackedDisappointing lectures
  • Only one old review with a quality score of 1 and .
  • material.
  • while lectures felt unfocused and unhelpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Difficulty was rated low, but and a poor overall experience make a solid A hard to trust or earn fairly.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

The sole student rated course difficulty at 1, suggesting light intellectual challenge despite poor teaching.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

The student reported attendance was mandatory for PSYCH111.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

The and left disappointed after unfocused teaching.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

; misaligned tests make grading feel unpredictable rather than clearly lenient or harsh.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Light

70/100

; complaints center on lecture quality and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Student says the professor just reads slides, gets sidetracked, and left them disappointed.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

The main complaint is about tests that do not match lecture or reading.

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person review describes PowerPoint-heavy, unfocused lectures and and reading.

Main concern

Tests do not match class material and the instructor loses focus during lecture.

What students said

“ and reading material. . Gets sidetracked.”
PSYCH111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as irrelevant to lecture and reading, which raises fairness risk.

Tests mismatch lectureTests mismatch readings

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

content and assigned readings.

Tests mismatch lectureTests mismatch readings
“ and reading material.”
PSYCH111

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I was excited for this class but in the end I was disappointed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ . Gets sidetracked.”

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“I was excited for this class but in the end I was disappointed.”

📝

35/100

“ and reading material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Gets sidetracked.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and reading material.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review from 2016 with limited detail and .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYCH1111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values