AI Rate Professor

Psychiatry

Dennis Jackson

PSYCH084 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Run away if you can; this is a teaching disaster with no instructional value.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPowerPoint ReaderNo Teaching SkillsRetaliatoryUnhelpfulProgram Failure
  • and refuses real answers to questions
  • Students warn of retaliation and a toxic program culture
  • Consistently rated terrible across multiple years

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

24/100

High difficulty ratings and a C+ plus zero instructional help make an A feel costly and uncertain.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Difficulty ratings of 4-5 and zero deeper teaching make the material feel hard without support.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and the overall tone is rigid and controlling.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every review calls him a bad teacher and warns that the program year becomes a total loss.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

C+ outcome, hard difficulty, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students describe the entire program year as a total loss under rigid, unhelpful instruction.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

, and lacks real teaching skill.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews focus on bad lecture style more than a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All four in-person PSYCH084 reviews slam him for , and creating a hostile program climate.

Main concern

Zero teaching skill plus fear of retaliation make the course a year-long loss.

What students said

“Completely lacking in teaching skills, does not give deeper meaning to information, just read from the .”
PSYCH084
“Reads off powerpoint slides word for word, did you get that?, WORD FOR WORD.”
PSYCH084
“Beware, don't get on his bad side, retaliation is real.”
PSYCH084

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Completely lacking in teaching skills, does not give deeper meaning to information, just read from the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting empty lectures and toxic program leadership. Credibility rating: Medium.

😵 Teaching Quality

8/100

“Completely lacking in teaching skills, does not give deeper meaning to information, just read from the .”

⚠️ Hostile Climate

10/100

“Beware, don't get on his bad side, retaliation is real.”

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“the entire year of your life shall be a total loss.”

📄 Lecture Style

8/100

“Reads off powerpoint slides word for word, did you get that?, WORD FOR WORD.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • just read from the
  • He answers your questions with questions

Theme 2

⚠️ About Program Climate

  • retaliation is real
  • the entire year of your life shall be a total loss
  • you'll feel uncomfortable and more frustrated after talking with him

Theme 3

📉 About Difficulty & Value

  • Completely lacking in teaching skills
  • There is no teaching style
  • At least he's consistently bad.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four consistently negative reviews spanning 2013-2016 give a stable signal despite older dates.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSYCH0844 reviews

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values