AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Hai Mai

MATH0952 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Skip unless you only need the grade cushion from and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterHard to understandExtra credit heavyRude when questionedUnclear lectures
  • Very low teaching clarity and quality ratings across both reviews
  • Offers lots of and chances to pass despite weak lectures
  • One student called her rude and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

and many pass opportunities make an A reachable even when lectures are weak.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content difficulty is modest, but is.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Students rate quality at 1 and one .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

She piles on and wants students to pass.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reviews do not describe and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students find , and rude when asked questions.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews give little breakdown beyond and overall grades.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person MATH0952 students report unclear teaching and mixed tone, with helping some pass while others feel dismissed.

Main concern

and rude responses when students ask questions.

What students said

“A bit difficult to understand, she gives a lot of , she wants us to pass so she gives us many opportunities.”
MATH0952
“ and rude to students when asked a question. .”
MATH0952

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and rude to students when asked a question. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting clarity, , and recommendation concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Clarity

25/100

“A bit difficult to understand, she gives a lot of , she wants us to pass so she gives us many opportunities.”

🚫 Recommendation

22/100

“ and rude to students when asked a question. .”

🎁 Path

78/100

“she gives a lot of , she wants us to pass so she gives us many opportunities.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • A bit difficult to understand
  • and rude to students when asked a question

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she gives a lot of
  • she wants us to pass so she gives us many opportunities

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two same-day 2015 reviews with short comments and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH09522 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1