AI Rate Professor

Biology

Tamara Maurizi

NURS112 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can; students describe distrust and worry about standing in the RN program.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUntrustworthy statementsCreates program anxietyAvoid for nursing pathLow quality scoresGood luck warning
  • Reviews are strongly negative with quality scores of 1 and 2 only.
  • One student says she denied prior statements and asked students to report on other instructors.
  • The short Good luck comment signals a hostile or unhelpful classroom climate.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

No student describes easy grades; one got a B and overall tone is cautionary rather than grade-friendly.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Difficulty ratings conflict (4 and 1), and comments give almost no content-clarity detail.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

; nothing suggests a flexible policy.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Low quality scores and trust-breaking comments .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

40/100

and low overall quality ratings.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

, so workload cannot be called light or heavy.

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students report denied statements, pressure to report other instructors, and a bare Good luck send-off.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments do not clearly describe whether .

Format shift

Based only on in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but harshly negative, citing denied statements and pressure to report on other instructors.

Main concern

Students fear for their status in the RN program around her behavior.

What students said

“Instructor would say things to me and the other students and then later swear she never made those statements.”
NURS112
“Good luck”
1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring rules.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Instructor would say things to me and the other students and then later swear she never made those statements. She would request that we report details about other instructors to her which made us worry about our status in the RN program.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting distrust and avoidance signals. Credibility rating: Low.

🚨 Trust Issues

15/100

“Instructor would say things to me and the other students and then later swear she never made those statements.”

👎

12/100

“Good luck”

😰 Program Anxiety

20/100

“She would request that we report details about other instructors to her which made us worry about our status in the RN program.”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Character & Trust

  • later swear she never made those statements
  • report details about other instructors to her
  • made us worry about our status in the RN program

Theme 2

📉 About Overall Experience

  • Good luck

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two short in-person reviews from 2013-2014, both negative but too few and thin for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

11 review
NURS1121 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values