AI Rate Professor

English

Katheryn Nanneman

ENGL814 · ENGL015 · ENG015 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid if ; students say you will mostly teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesUnclear AssignmentsTalks in CirclesSelf-Teach from TextbookDo Not Recommend
  • Students consistently find instructions and
  • Many report learning nothing and teaching themselves from the textbook
  • Multiple students dropped or strongly advise against taking her

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Grading can be fair once you decode her expectations, but work.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty comes less from content depth and and lectures.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, though one review notes she sometimes misses class.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Nearly every student warns and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One student says she grades fairly and likes simple sentences once you figure her out.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload centers on writing assignments and textbooks rather than sheer volume.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students call lectures confusing, circular, and ineffective, with some dropping the class.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Writing assignments and essays dominate; exams are mentioned mainly as distracting lecture settings.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person English composition sections are widely criticized for , and .

Main concern

Unclear expectations and and .

What students said

“ ! .”
ENG015
“Probably one of the .”
ENGL015
“ because I didn't understand her instructions.”
ENGL015

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but one student and distracts the class.

Talks During Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments rarely describe exam structure beyond distraction during exams.

Talks During Exams
“ and .”
ENG015

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Probably one of the . She has very bad teaching skills and you even if you pay attention, you will learn nothing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 consistently negative in-person reviews on clarity and teaching. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Probably one of the . She has very bad teaching skills”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ ! .”

🌀 Clarity Issues

18/100

“ and talks in circles but she grades pretty fairly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and talks in circles
  • she talks to much and
  • She often looses her train of thought and causes confusion for the class.

Theme 2

📝 About Assignments

  • its hard to understand what she really wants
  • I could not understand what she wanted from us

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • !
  • Probably one of the

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Ten consistently negative in-person reviews from 2007-2013 show strong agreement on poor clarity and teaching quality.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 56
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG0155 reviews
ENGL0154 reviews
ENGL8141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values