AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Rebecca Giem

SOC100 · SOCIO10 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Consider her only if you will read ahead and seek help; avoid if you need tight structure and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing instructorWilling to helpOff-topic lecturesUnclear assignmentsReading-heavy
  • Reviews are sharply split between caring support that leads to A grades and complaints of .
  • , but tests and expectations frustrate some students.
  • Older sample size is small, so outcomes depend heavily on student fit and effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

72/100

At least one student earned an A with ordinary reading and , though .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Content difficulty is mostly moderate when students prepare readings, despite high expectations from some reviews.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

Attendance is not formally scored in comments, but and discussion.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Half the while half say stay away, so fit matters more than a blanket yes.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

, but other students call tests ridiculous and unclear.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

66/100

Assignments are often described as not difficult if .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

Some find her understanding and open to student voices; and self-focused.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments mention both regular assignments and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person sociology reviews split between students who earned easy As with support and students who felt lectures wasted time.

Main concern

Clarity of assignments and .

What students said

“Her assignments are not difficult. If you do the .”
SOC100
“ and .”
SOCIO10
“She spends too much time talking about herself”
SOCIO10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; students mainly disagree on whether tests are fair or ridiculous.

Reading-based prepUnclear test expectations

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; one side finds them manageable after reading, another finds them ridiculous.

Reading-based prepUnclear test expectations
“ and .”
SOCIO10
“If you do the .”
SOC100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Those who said bad things about this instructor are wrong and misrepresented her uniques qualities she offered her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews (2007-2013), emphasizing polarization on clarity versus support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

46/100

“She is not a very good teacher. and .”

🤝 Support For Students

75/100

“she is very willing to help her students succeed even if it means staying after class”

📈 Grade Accessibility

72/100

“I pass with A. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She spends too much time talking about herself
  • This is a class worth attending if you want to learn and express your opinions
  • Shes an idiot.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I pass with A

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and
  • She was very busy with her PH.D. Stay away.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only four old reviews with extreme polarization and limited grade data keep overall reliability low.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SOC1002 reviews
SOCIO102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values