AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Patricia Fraiser

ANTHR102 · ANTHRO106 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless and tolerate weak, curt instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnhelpful responsesVague feedbackRude communicationBoring long audiosGrammar stickler
  • Students find her unhelpful, vague, and short or rude when asked questions
  • Online materials include long boring audios and typo-filled lectures
  • Content is science-heavy with discussions and exams; support is weak

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Four exams and strict grammar or science expectations make a strong .

Online and in-person both stress difficulty and weak support; online emphasizes vague help.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students call the science content difficult and the .

Both formats describe difficulty around 4; online adds science and grammar struggle.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Multiple students say stay away , and weak teaching materials.

Both online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

High difficulty ratings and grammar-heavy expectations .

Format shift

Online and in-person both imply tough standards; little grade detail given.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Three discussions and ; workload is steady not endless.

Format shift

Online review lists discussions and exams; .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Students describe vague answers, rude tone, boring audios, and typos instead of .

Format shift

Online stresses unhelpful replies; in-person stresses rude tone and poor materials.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

; tests are repeatedly mentioned as central.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and English-major expectations in a non-English class.

Main concern

Attitude and if content is passable.

What students said

“Stay away from this teacher. She expectes you to be an english major.”
ANTHRO106
“Her audios are boring and long, her printable lectures have numerous typos.”
ANTHR102

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online ANTHRO106 has three discussions and four exams; instructor gives vague answers and .

Main concern

No real help when stuck on science or grammar expectations.

What students said

“The . She gives very vague answers and expects you to figure things out for yourself”
ANTHRO106

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and ; reviews do not prove open-book or proctoring details.

Four examsDiscussion postsSyllabus-driven

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not describe format or .

Tests criticized
“ .”
ANTHR102

Online

three discussions and four exams; .

Four examsThree discussions
“ and four exams.”
ANTHRO106

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Stay away from this teacher. She expectes you to be an english major. Hello!!!! not an english class. She is rude when replying”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews (1 online, 3 in-person), highlighting weak support and attitude. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Support

25/100

“The . She gives very vague answers”

😠 Attitude Concerns

22/100

“She is rude when replying and all she says read and listen to the audio.”

📚 Course Difficulty

32/100

“This course can be difficult for students struggling in science, and grammar.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • gives very vague answers
  • Shes very crude

Theme 2

🎧 About Materials

  • audios are boring and long
  • printable lectures have numerous typos
  • all she says read and listen to the audio

Theme 3

⚠️ About Difficulty

  • difficult for students struggling in science
  • expectes you to be an english major

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only 4 reviews across 2007-2013 with limited grade detail, but opinions are consistently negative on help and attitude.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTHR1022 reviews
ANTHRO1062 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values