AI Rate Professor

Speech

Daniel Tuckerman

SPEEC101 · CMSP101 · CMSP103 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him for speech if you want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEngaging storytellerBuilds speaking confidenceClass-involved styleRelaxed approachMemorable speech coach
  • Students love his stories and involved teaching style for public speaking
  • Relaxed atmosphere builds confidence without crushing pressure

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Relaxed coaching helps, but speech performance still requires real practice and delivery effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty ratings sit mid-range; content is manageable with his support but still involves public speaking.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Every review .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

; focus is skill growth and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

Speech class work is implied but not described as .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students praise information depth, involved style, stories, and lasting confidence gains.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Assessment centers on speeches and class performance rather than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and story-rich with a relaxed vibe that builds real public-speaking skill.

Main concern

Small sample and older reviews; difficulty varies by student anxiety with speeches.

What students said

“LOVE HIM. He is full of information and teaches in a very class involved style.”
CMSP103
“EXCELLENT class and I will never forget it.”
SPEEC101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe speech performances and classroom practice, not formal high-stakes written exams.

Performance speechesNo exam format described

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person work is speech delivery and class involvement; .

Public speaking performancesStory-based class examples
“You will have public speaking down perfectly.”
CMSP103
“His relaxed approach made it easy.”
CMSP101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I put this class off for the first 5 years I was in college and am SO glad I waited so . Tuckerman! EXCELLENT class”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting speech coaching and confidence. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He is full of information and teaches in a very class involved style.”

🗣️ Confidence Building

85/100

“Had a great time listening to his stories and building my confidence in the area of public speaking.”

👍 Recommendation

90/100

“ if you can.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • class involved style
  • full of information
  • His relaxed approach made it easy

Theme 2

💬 About Public Speaking Growth

  • building my confidence
  • public speaking down perfectly
  • I will never forget it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only 3 consistently positive in-person reviews from 2007-2013 with solid detail but limited sample size.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CMSP1011 review
CMSP1031 review
SPEEC1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values