AI Rate Professor

Psychiatry

Neomi Sabio

PSYC086 · PSYCH086 · SYCH086 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

if you can; students report toxic strictness and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHarsh and StrictAnger OutburstsVague TestsPowerPoint ReaderAttendance Lockout
  • Students describe impersonal strictness, yelling, and stress-inducing rules.
  • Material can be easy but , and opinion-based.
  • Late lockouts and and grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

Content may be easy but subjective grading, vague tests, and and endurance dependent.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Students say materials themselves are not hard; difficulty comes from testing style and rules rather than deep theory.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

Being three minutes late means lockout and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Friends warn others, students lose motivation, and nearly all reviews are strongly negative.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

, and poorly justified exam answers dominate complaints.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

and long PowerPoint-heavy class time create heavy mental load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Described as impersonal, angry, choppy, and .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

questions and strict quiz penalties.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person psych courses feel high-stress with , and exams that mix concepts poorly.

Main concern

Anger, lockouts, and unfair testing crush motivation even when content is not hard.

What students said

“I thought the materials were easy. But they made it unfair.”
PSYC086
“3 minutes late, got locked out and got automatic zeros on quizes.”
SYCH086
“whats with the anger outburts?”
PSYCH086

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams feel poorly worded and opinion-graded while .

Vague Test QuestionsSubjective GradingQuiz Lockout ZerosExam HeavyPowerPoint Based

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes are called vague, unfair, and .

Vague QuestionsOpinion Based AnswersAutomatic Quiz ZerosBig Exam Weight
“ , then could not support her reasoning for the correct answer that she chose.”
PSYCH086
“ poor word and grammar usage.”
SYCH086

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I thought the materials were easy. But they made it unfair. Its the ”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting harsh climate and unfair exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Climate

16/100

“whats with the anger outburts?”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“I got a few friends who went through the program warning me about Neomi and Marcia. They weren't wrong.”

🚪

12/100

“3 minutes late, got locked out and got automatic zeros on quizes.”

📝

22/100

“they teach one thing and ask another on exams then reason out their correct answers based on their opinions, not lecture”

Theme 1

😠 About Character and Climate

  • when stressed out she would easily give attitude and blow up.
  • how about just enjoy teaching and providing a positive learning environment
  • im glad im out of this program, aint gonna see her or Marcia again.

Theme 2

📈 and Rules

  • . Ridiculous rules!
  • My grades suffered as the .
  • They always gave me a hard time on the irrelevant things.

Theme 3

📚 About Lectures and Tests

  • Usually choppy in lecture and .
  • Almost 90% of slides plagiarized as exactly and chronologically from the textbook.
  • no and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seven detailed negative in-person reviews from late 2012 agree strongly, but the sample is modest and all one-sided.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSYCH0865 reviews
PSYC0861 review
SYCH0861 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values