AI Rate Professor

English

Tom Kinnard

ENG102 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Promising pick based on one glowing review, but treat the rating as provisional until more students report.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyNice GuyVery OrganizedChallenging WorkSupportive Presence
  • Single review praises him as a .
  • Work can still be challenging even though overall difficulty is rated low.
  • Sample size is too small for strong certainty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Low difficulty rating with a note that work can be challenging suggests a solid grade is reachable with steady effort.

All ; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Difficulty is rated 2 of 5 and the only comment frames the course as manageable with some challenge.

All ; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All ; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

The sole review is strongly positive on personality and organization.

All ; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

No grade complaints appear; tone implies fair, student-friendly standards.

Format shift

All ; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Work is described as challenging but not overwhelming.

Format shift

All ; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Called a nice guy and .

Format shift

All ; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review .

Format shift

All ; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

One in-person ENG102 student calls him a still challenge you.

Main concern

Only one review exists, so workload and .

What students said

“ THOUGH.”
ENG102

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The .

“ THOUGH.”
ENG102

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ THOUGH.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“ THOUGH.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ THOUGH.”

📚 Workload

58/100

“WORK CAN BE CHALLENGING THOUGH.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • NICE GUY

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Work

  • WORK CAN BE CHALLENGING THOUGH.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one brief 2011 review exists, so scores rest on a tiny and outdated sample.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values