AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Nickolas Zoumbos

ACCT201 · ACCT010 · ACCT200 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can learn independently and ask questions outside class; classroom experience is highly mixed.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed ReviewsOld School LedgerLoud RepeaterHelpful Outside ClassPolarizing Temper
  • and easy A with modest weekly study
  • Others call him one of the and has a bad temper
  • Teaching style is old-school ledger work with uneven classroom experience

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Some say an hour or two a week can earn an A, but .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Difficulty ratings and comments range from .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Roughly half the while others strongly advise against him.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

At least one student earned an A , and another got a B starting from zero knowledge.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

68/100

Few tests and modest weekly study are mentioned; .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Praise for poor explanations and bad temper.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Comments emphasize tests and ledger-style .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person accounting sections split sharply between and easy and those who find him unhelpful and short-tempered.

Main concern

, and reports of bad temper.

What students said

“Great Teacher, easy, fun, and and .”
ACCT200
“He is one of the . He does not explain himself, or accounting concepts very well.”
ACCT200
“He gets to the point, and he knows what he is teaching.”
ACCT200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention few tests and old-school ledger work but .

Few TestsLedger Based Work

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person assessment appears test-light with traditional ledger-style accounting work; proctoring details are not stated.

Few TestsLedger Based Work
“He doesn't give that much tests and .”
ACCT200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great Teacher, easy, fun, and and . I recommend him for your accounting course and if ur willing/able to put like an hour or 2 a week then u can expect an A”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized teaching quality and grade accessibility. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“i wish they had more acct. teachers like him.”

📈 Grade Effort

62/100

“if ur willing/able to put like an hour or 2 a week then u can expect an A”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He gets to the point, and he knows what he is teaching
  • he is old school, work with ledger no computer type

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if ur willing/able to put like an hour or 2 a week then u can expect an A
  • i knew nothing before and i got a b
  • He doesn't give that much tests

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • his voice would be annoying because he raises it when he repeats himself
  • He has a very bad temper and doesn't like to answer questions

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eight in-person reviews from 2005-2009 give a decent sample with and negative clusters, but they are old and lack recent confirmation.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACCT2006 reviews
ACCT0101 review
ACCT2011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values