AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Tilahun Muleta

CHEM101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are ready to teach yourself from the textbook.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAccent barrierTextbook dependentContent-heavyAvoid if possibleSelf-study needed
  • Reviews split between decent and strongly negative teaching quality.
  • Students say you must read the book hard; lazy students will not do well.
  • One .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Comments stress heavy information and that lazy students will not do well, so an A .

All evidence is in-person.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Lots of info and textbook-heavy study needs make the course feel hard despite mixed difficulty ratings.

In-person only.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

In-person only; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

One student and the other only calls him decent with .

Both reviews are in-person and overall discourage enrollment.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

; success and notes.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students report a lot of information and required textbook/note work.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

thick accent and subject knowledge versus a strong horrible-teacher warning.

Format shift

In-person only.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

In-person only; assessment mix not specified.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person CHEM101 feedback is mixed-to-poor: thick accent, heavy info load, and .

Main concern

Teaching clarity is weak; success .

What students said

“Decent professor. Thick accent but he repeats if necessary. .”
CHEM101
“ ...He is not a good teacher period....If alright....Horrible professor, don't waste your time and energy within that class.”
CHEM101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students emphasize textbook and notes study instead.

“be prepared to read your book and notes if you want a decent grade. There is a lot of info.”
CHEM101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ...He is not a good teacher period....If alright....Horrible professor, don't waste your time and energy within that class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews with . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“Horrible professor, don't waste your time and energy within that class.”

📚

30/100

“be prepared to read your book and notes if you want a decent grade. There is a lot of info.”

👎 Recommendation

25/100

“ ...He is not a good teacher period.”

🗣️ Communication

40/100

“Thick accent but he repeats if necessary. .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Thick accent but he repeats if necessary
  • He knows the subject very well
  • Horrible professor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is a lot of info. Lazy students wont do well.
  • If alright
  • be prepared to read your book and notes if you want a decent grade

Theme 3

⚠️ Warnings

  • don't waste your time and energy within that class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two 2009 reviews with conflicting tone and little grade or .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values