Ian Constable

MULT201 · MULT211 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 14/100
RMP rating: 1.0/5
Take again: 0%
Difficulty: 4.8

The decision

Run from this professor; weak teaching, crushing workload, and unprofessional conduct make the course a poor risk.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDoesn't Teach SoftwareOverwhelming HomeworkLecture RamblingTough GraderInappropriate Conduct

Does not master the software he teaches and wastes class time troubleshooting
Heavy homework paired with weak instruction forces self-teaching via YouTube
Multiple reports of inappropriate threats and unprofessional student interactions

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some high grades appear, but and under-taught material make an A costly.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Fast, .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

and class time is long and lecture-heavy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

All five reviews rate quality 1/5 and urge that he should not teach.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

; points lost on mistakes students say were never taught.

Format shift

Consistent across in-person MULT reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Lots of .

Format shift

Consistent across in-person MULT reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students say he cannot use the software, rambles, and forces self-teaching.

Format shift

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

exams.

Format shift

Consistent across in-person MULT reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person MULT courses feel like long rambles, weak software instruction, and .

Main concern

Instructor competence gaps, workload overload, and reported threats toward students.

What students said

“Teacher does not understand the software he teaches.”
MULT201

“Gave us fast paced lessons with little substance, Youtube had to teach me.”
MULT211

“He THREATENED students with opposing political views and got close with young female students.”
MULT201

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize harsh grading on under-taught .

Tough GradingAssignment Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; assessment risk is high via tough grading and .

Tough GraderLots of Homework

“He takes points away for little mistakes he did not/ .”
MULT201

“ knowledge he teaches.”
MULT211

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Teacher does not understand the software he teaches. He will literally spend half a class trying to figure something out because apparently "Maya is such a bad software".”
Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting weak teaching, overload, and conduct concerns. Credibility rating: High.

📉 Teaching Quality

8/100

“Teacher does not understand the software he teaches.”

📚 Workload Overload

12/100

“Too much work with what little time is left after hearing this teacher yap for 2.5/3 hours.”

🚫 Recommendation

5/100

“He should not be a teacher.”

⚠️ Professional Conduct

5/100

“He THREATENED students with opposing political views and got close with young female students.”

Theme 1

💻 About Teaching Competence

Teacher does not understand the software he teaches
Youtube had to teach me
doesn't teach as much as he needs to

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

Lots of homework
Wasted 6 hours of my time each week
Way too much work to do with what little time we have

Theme 3

⚠️ About Conduct

threatened students with differing political views
His student interactions were inappropriate

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistent recent in-person reviews with detailed negative themes and no conflicting praise.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 50

1 out of 55

Course coverage

MULT2014 reviews

MULT2111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

A- 2

B range

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

C+ 1

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values