AI Rate Professor

Film

Richard St. Ofle

FTV10 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

; unless film access and support are guaranteed.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyFormat dependentUnresponsive onlineHilarious in personExtra creditFilm access issues
  • In-person students call him the .
  • Online asynchronous sections repeatedly slam slow or and inaccessible films.
  • Overall quality splits hard by format; take again is about 50% and grades range A+ to C.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

In person many report easy As with ; and support fail.

In person is clearly easy A; online is harder mainly due to access and response issues, not content.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Film intro content is fun and and weekly papers.

Both formats call content ; online pain is logistics.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; in .

; in-person reviews say yes mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Strong yes for in-person comedy and care; strong no for unresponsive online sections.

; online reviews largely refuse to recommend.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and easy in-person grades help, but online students report .

Format shift

In person feels generous; and inconsistent.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Film viewing, discussions, and weekly short papers; lots of get.

Format shift

In person notes weekly 2-page papers; online adds film-hunt burden.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Excellent live humor and care collide with poor online responsiveness and engagement.

Format shift

In person excellent; online poor—overall averages out.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Heavy emphasis , and rather than formal exams.

Format shift

Neither format clearly describes high-stakes proctored exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person FTV10 , and widely recommended as an easy enjoyable class.

Main concern

and advanced readings add steady work even when the class feels easy.

What students said

“richard is the GOAT! so kind and caring, and knows so much about film and tv.”
FTV10
“Super helpful and very funny. Honestly if you don't pass this class it's on you”
FTV10
“ . I can't decide if hes more funny, more charming, or more smart”
FTV10

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online async FTV10 is often unresponsive, with , and required films students cannot access.

Main concern

and missing film access break the online experience.

What students said

“Prof. St Ofle takes weeks to respond to messages in his online class.”
FTV10
“Horribly unresponsive. I had MULTIPLE emails that went unanswered”
FTV10
“It WILL be difficult if you don't have access to any of the films needed for the class.”
FTV10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and ; policy details are sparse.

Assignment-basedFilm responsesWeekly papersExtra credit

Assessment risk

Varies

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and weekly short papers; exams are not clearly described.

Weekly papersReadingsIn-class discussionExtra credit
“I wasn't really a fan of being assigned a 2 page paper every single week, but it wasn't too hard.”
FTV10
“Super helpful and very funny. Honestly if you don't pass this class it's on you”
FTV10

Online

Online evidence centers on film-based homework and unclear grading; .

Film-based assignmentsUnclear gradingExtra credit
“He doesn't provide the films, assigns work based on those films”
FTV10
“ and inconsistent.”
FTV10

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I don't think this professor is good to take online asynch. He takes a and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews (7 online, 5 in person), highlighting the format split. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality Split

52/100

“richard is the GOAT! so kind and caring, and knows so much about film and tv.”

💻 Online Support Failure

15/100

“Horribly unresponsive. I had MULTIPLE emails that went unanswered, a few of which regarded content that .”

👍 In-Person Recommendation

90/100

“TAKE HIS CLASS!!”

🎬 Film Access Barrier

40/100

“It WILL be difficult if you don't have access to any of the films needed for the class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫

  • so kind and caring
  • Super helpful and very funny
  • Easy class

Theme 2

💻 About Online Experience

  • and pasted
  • still no answer

Theme 3

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • Easy, class. I'd 100% take it again
  • 2 page paper every single week
  • and inconsistent

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve recent detailed reviews with a and consistent themes inside each format.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

FTV1012 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values