AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Neil Chapman

MASC110 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are fully fine teaching yourself from the textbook and only need a grade.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTextbook Copy-PasteFrustrating TeachingTough GraderAvoidSelf-Study Required
  • Teaching is mostly textbook snippets with .
  • Students can still earn an A but learn almost nothing deeper.
  • if you want meaningful instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Student still earned an A- despite poor teaching, but A.

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Rated difficulty 4 with little instructional support, so content feels hard without real teaching help.

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

90/100

as not mandatory.

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Student explicitly says avoid after a .

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

though one student still finished with an A-.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews do not describe heavy homework volume, only weak teaching quality.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Copies , and blocks deeper learning.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments do not clearly show whether .

Format shift

Evidence comes only from one Online review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

short textbook , and students are told to accept the book as final.

Main concern

Zero teaching depth and no useful follow-up when you ask for clarity.

What students said

“Frustrating to learn from him. Don't bother seeking a deeper learning of course content. He'll simply copy and paste short snippets from the textbook.”
MASC110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Still got an A, but avoid.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 Online review, highlighting empty teaching and . Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Frustrating to learn from him. Don't bother seeking a deeper learning of course content.”

📘 Textbook-Only Answers

15/100

“He'll simply copy and paste short snippets from the textbook. Period.”

⚠️

12/100

“Still got an A, but avoid.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He'll simply copy and paste short snippets from the textbook.
  • .
  • Don't bother seeking a deeper learning of course content.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Still got an A, but avoid.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed Online review from 2023, so but sample size is very small.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MASC1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values