AI Rate Professor

Biology

Rick Cowlishaw

MICRO · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Strong pick if you want engaging micro lectures and labs and are willing to attend and participate.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear grading criteriaGreat lecturesFun labsParticipation mattersGroup projects
  • Students praise clear lectures and enjoyable labs in microbiology.
  • and participation and group work matter.
  • Only one recent review exists, so confidence is limited despite a perfect quality score.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Difficulty is rated 4 and the reported grade is B-, so an A likely .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Students rate the content as difficult (4/5) even while calling lectures and .

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

The and participation matters.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Would take again is yes with a 5/5 quality rating for lectures and labs.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Clear grading criteria help, but a B- under high .

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Group projects and labs imply steady work without comments calling it overwhelming.

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Student calls lectures great and .

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Tags and comment , and participation rather than exam-heavy setup.

Format shift

Based on the single in-person review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person micro with , and clear grading criteria.

Main concern

Only one review and a .

What students said

“Great lectures and fun labs”
micro

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great lectures and fun labs”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting lectures, labs, and participation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“Great lectures and fun labs”

👍

90/100

“Yes”

📋

70/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great lectures and fun labs

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Participation

  • Participation matters
  • Group projects

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2022 in-person review with moderate detail, so findings rest on a .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

micro1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values