AI Rate Professor

Management

Kelly Wibbenmeyer

OMGT444 · ISM200 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; grading and as inconsistent and unfair.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderInconsistent requirementsUnfair feedbackAvoid at all costsAwful instructor
  • Consistently called the and in-person courses
  • Requirements and deductions shift; students mark work as unfair and unpredictable

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Even an A- and unpredictable with constant unjustified deductions.

Online and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Difficulty is high mainly because standards and because content is clearly advanced.

Both formats rate difficulty 5 with the .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

.

and in-person sections.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and urges others not to enroll.

and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

; students report arbitrary deductions and shifting reasons for .

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Weekly papers and ongoing rework under shifting criteria make the load feel heavy.

Format shift

Workload pain is strongest in .

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

, and zero recommendation.

Format shift

Awful teaching claims are consistent online and in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments center on papers and assignment deductions rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

changed every lecture and challenges to marks were dismissed.

Main concern

Moving target requirements and .

What students said

“Gave different requirements for the .”
ISM200

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe inconsistent assignment standards, false writing-mechanic deductions, and unfair weekly grade cuts despite following guidance.

Main concern

Requirements change after submission and .

What students said

“She was so inconsistent with what she wanted in the assignment”
ISM200
“Will deduct grades for whatever she feels like every week.”
OMGT444

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and ; they .

Paper-focused assessment

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comment highlights shifting final paper requirements, not a .

Final paper with changing requirements
“Gave different requirements for the .”
ISM200

Online

Online comments and deductions, not exam software or proctoring.

Weekly papersHarsh paper feedback
“ .”
OMGT444

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews (2 online, 1 in and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

5/100

“ .”

⚖️

8/100

“Unfair grader, even if paper she will find something else to reduce your grade for.”

📉 Teaching Quality

8/100

“She was the institution.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • Marks down for things that aren't missing.
  • Will deduct grades for whatever she feels like every week.
  • graded on false writing mechanics

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Experience

  • She was the institution.
  • .
  • Awful instructor

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • .
  • .
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Three highly consistent negative reviews across online and in-person formats from 2021-2022 with .

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ISM2002 reviews
OMGT4441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values