AI Rate Professor

Management

Shelley Bradbury

OGMT325 · HRD345 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative; students report and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderUnclear expectationsRidiculous homework loadNothing ever good enoughTough on APA
  • Consistently described as an and grammar issues
  • Students feel help is unhelpful because she only restates the rubric
  • Heavy weekly writing and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students say even strong effort rarely meets her bar and report C or D-range outcomes from minor mistakes.

Evidence comes only from Online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content itself is not always hard, but her extreme standards make the course feel punishing.

Evidence comes only from Online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

; the others do not specify.

Evidence comes only from Online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

No student recommends her and multiple reviews .

Evidence comes only from Online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Minor APA or and students never feel work is good enough.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from Online reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Weekly load includes many as ridiculous.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from Online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

18/100

Help often means restating instructions; and demoralizing.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from Online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades hinge on weekly writing, APA format, and discussion posts rather than exams.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from Online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews uniformly call her a and heavy writing workload.

Main concern

Harsh scoring on minor format issues and unhelpful responses when students ask for clarification.

What students said

“Grammatical errors or slightly wrong apa format will get you a 68/100 on a paper. .”
OGMT325
“The . 9 posts + a long writing assignment per week?!”
HRD345

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers and weekly posts; .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Assessment evidence centers on writing assignments and APA rubrics, not exams.

Writing-heavy assessmentsStrict APA grading
“Grammatical errors or slightly wrong apa format will get you a 68/100 on a paper.”
OGMT325
“ !”
HRD345

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Nothing is ever good enough. Grammatical errors or slightly wrong apa format will get you a 68/100 on a paper. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 , and heavy writing load. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

10/100

“She grades like a Nazi and honestly nothing ever felt good enough for her.”

📚 Overwhelming Workload

12/100

“The . 9 posts + a long writing assignment per week?!”

🚫

8/100

“You'd be lucky to get a C.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • You'd be lucky to get a C
  • slightly wrong apa format will get you a 68/100

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • 9 posts + a
  • Set up to fail

Theme 3

❓ About Expectations

  • just recite the rubric and assignment
  • never feel like your work is good enough

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Four consistently negative Online reviews spanning 2013-2020 provide and workload.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HRD3453 reviews
OGMT3251 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values