AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Caleb Ediger

NURS330 · NSG410 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

; students report hostile communication and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerRude and CondescendingTough GraderNo Email AccessUncaring CommunicationAvoid Completely
  • Students describe him as rude, condescending, and threatening.
  • Correspondence is harsh and he .
  • Heavy APA demands and daily posting make grades hard to earn.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and APA perfection make a strong grade hard work.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Difficulty ratings of 3-5 and heavy weekly posting demand make content feel hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Both .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and comments call him the .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

and daily cited posts required for a decent grade.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students must post every day with citations even for their own words.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Described as rude, condescending, threatening, and uncaring with quality scores of 1.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Weekly posts and APA perfection drive .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Both in-person nursing reviews rate quality 1 and strongly advise against taking him again due to rudeness and .

Main concern

, and perfectionist APA requirements.

What students said

“He is the . He is rude, condescending and threatening.”
NSG410
“His correspondence with students needs ALOT of work as it can be rude and seemingly uncaring in nature.”
NURS330

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is the . He is rude, condescending and threatening.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting hostility, communication, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Quality

10/100

“He is the . He is rude, condescending and threatening.”

💬 Communication Fail

12/100

“I have never met a professor that .”

📝

18/100

“He is also big on APA perfection. Your posts for the week are expected to be cited even if you use your own words and you must post everyday.”

Theme 1

😤 About Personality and Tone

  • rude, condescending and threatening
  • correspondence with students needs ALOT of work as it can be rude and seemingly uncaring
  • I hope yo never see him after this class again

Theme 2

📈 About Work and Grades

  • big on APA perfection
  • must post everyday. To earn a decent grade

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two older reviews from 2018-2019, both highly negative and consistent but a very small sample.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

NSG4101 review
NURS3301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values