AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Irene Hollman

MATH60 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

Avoid; and no support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing methodsNo helpUtter failMath frustration
  • Student calls the class an utter fail with no help
  • Even a math-oriented student argued that her methods made no sense
  • Quality is very low with max difficulty

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Difficulty is rated 5 and the only comment frames the class as an utter fail with no help.

All .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Max difficulty plus confusing methods make the content feel unworkable.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Student labels the experience an utter fail and gives quality 1.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Tone is failure-focused with no sign of .

Format shift

All .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Difficulty 5 and confusion imply heavy struggle even without workload details.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Methods reportedly make no sense and students get no help.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

No breakdown of .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single harsh in-person review reports no help and methods that make no sense even to strong math students.

Main concern

Teaching clarity and support appear critically weak.

What students said

“Fail. Utter fail. no help.”
MATH60
“I watched a math oriented student completely argue with her because her method made no sense.”
MATH60

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; overall experience is described as failing.

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Fail. Utter fail. no help.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting confusion and lack of help. Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Disaster

10/100

“Fail. Utter fail. no help.”

🧩 Method Confusion

12/100

“I watched a math oriented student completely argue with her because her method made no sense.”

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“Fail. Utter fail. no help.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • Fail. Utter fail. no help.
  • her method made no sense.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty

  • I watched a math oriented student completely argue with her

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2009 review with extreme negativity and no corroborating grades or later ratings.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values