AI Rate Professor

Business

Chuck Stump

STL310 · BQM310 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

if you want a and can tolerate unconventional, frustrating methods.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHigh StandardsHard But Worth ItPolarizing StyleHands-On FrustrationAccessible Mentor
  • One student calls him the and strong support.
  • Another student hated intentional project changes and frustration-based teaching plus a .
  • Expect a very hard class where experience depends heavily on whether you buy his teaching style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Both reviews rate difficulty at 5 and describe high standards or .

; no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Students call the class one of the hardest and rate difficulty at maximum.

All difficulty .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Neither review .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

and one strong rejection leave recommendation split by teaching-style fit.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

High standards and harsh project design suggest strict evaluation, with no lenient-grading comments.

Format shift

In-person only; no grade outcomes reported.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Hardest-class comments plus a required 7 to 10 page reflection paper point to a heavy load.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Good

65/100

Praise for accessibility and , but the frustration-based style alienates others.

Format shift

In-person reviews range from quality 5 to quality 1.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Team assignments, mid-project changes, and a long end-of-class paper dominate assessment talk.

Format shift

; exams not described.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

one praises high standards with heavy support; the other rejects deliberate frustration tactics and a .

Main concern

, and uneven enjoyment of his style.

What students said

“His class was undoubtedly one of the hardest so far but !”
STL310
“He purposely allows you do do the team assignment wrong and even change the frustrate you.”
BQM310

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize team projects and a .

Team ProjectsLong Reflective Paper

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person evidence highlights team assignments and a 7 to 10 page paper on what .

Team Assignments7-10 Page Paper
“At the end he wants 7 to 10 page paper on what you learned in the class. NOTHING.”
BQM310

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His class was undoubtedly one of the hardest so far but !”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 polarized in-person reviews spanning 2006-2009. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

65/100

“Mr. Stump is hands down the of studying with.”

🔥 Extreme Difficulty

15/100

“His class was undoubtedly one of the hardest so far but !”

⚠️ Polarizing Methods

35/100

“He purposely allows you do do the team assignment wrong and even change the frustrate you.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He took and as well.
  • A very different teaching style.
  • He purposely allows you do do the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He did set high standards but he provided a lot of assistance
  • one of the hardest so far but !
  • At the end he wants 7 to 10 page paper on what you learned

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Two detailed but old and conflicting reviews give moderate insight with limited sample size and no recent data.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

BQM3101 review
STL3101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values