AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Hyun Shin

CHEMISTRY · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Avoid this chemistry class unless you can fully teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesTough graderHeavy busyworkNo study guidesHigh dropout
  • , and overcomplicate material with .
  • , and papers create busywork while .
  • and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Tough grading, mismatched exams, and hard.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Lectures overcomplicate material, pace is too fast, and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance is listed as .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Nearly every student and harsh load.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

, and work that often goes ungraded until too late.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

, and test-heavy structure create constant busywork.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students say lectures make no sense, help is refused, and organization is poor.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and as the main barrier.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person chemistry is described as boot-camp style with , and exams that do not match study guides.

Main concern

High dropout, poor organization, and .

What students said

“DON'T. At and says he is willing to help but when I went to office hours/stayed after class he wouldn't help at all.”
chemistry
“35 students, only 10 stayed because the class was extremely difficult and confusing.”
chemistry
“ study guides!”
chemistry

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

material, and paired with .

Test heavyNo reliable study guidesExams not based on reviews

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Exams are test-heavy and often not based on study guides, making them unexpectedly difficult.

Test heavyNo study guidesExams not based on reviews
“ study guides!”
chemistry
“there are .”
chemistry

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DON'T. At and says he is willing to help but when I went to office hours/stayed after class he wouldn't help at all.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, highlighting confusion, harsh load, and dropout risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“His lecturing makes no sense and over complicates the material.”

📉 Recommendation

5/100

“Beware! !”

📚 Workload Crush

12/100

“Long lab reports, with hw, and pre lab. A lot of busy work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lecture is long he over complicates things making it difficult to understand.
  • he lectures as if we are already proficient at the subject.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 35 students, only 10 stayed because the class was extremely difficult and confusing.
  • study guides!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support

  • I would try to ask questions.
  • All of the work he assigns is never graded, leaving students to wonder if they are at a passing grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seven recent consistent in-person reviews with detailed complaints and matching grade outcomes.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

chemistry7 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 2