AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Chris Sachs

AJ51 · AJ52 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; students describe a hostile, unprofessional classroom unfit for a diverse academy setting.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnprofessionalHostile EnvironmentLecture HeavyMandatory AttendanceCharacter Concerns
  • Both reviews rate quality at 1 and describe serious professionalism and respect problems.
  • Students report inappropriate language and mockery of LGBTQ classmates.
  • and classes are lecture-heavy, yet both reviewers still received A grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Both students earned A grades despite max difficulty ratings, but comments never describe an easy path to an A.

.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Both reviewers rated difficulty at 5 and described a harsh, lecture-heavy experience.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

and comments urge that he should not be teaching this population.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Students earned A grades, but and instead focus on hostile classroom climate.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Tagged lecture-heavy with max difficulty ratings; .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Quality scores of 1 and detailed claims of unprofessional, disrespectful conduct toward students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews emphasize lecture-heavy delivery but give .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and heavy lecturing; students focus on character and professionalism failures rather than content mastery.

Main concern

Inappropriate language, mockery of LGBTQ students, and lack of respect for diverse classmates.

What students said

“Should not be teaching in a police academy with various ethic backgrounds and alternative lifestyle students.”
AJ52
“his mockery of LGBTQ students reflects a troubling absence of respect and empathy”
AJ51

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

No student comments clearly document exam format, proctoring tools, or open-book policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Should not be teaching in a police academy with various ethic backgrounds and alternative lifestyle students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting professionalism and climate themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Quality

10/100

“The teacher in question demonstrates a lack of professionalism by using inappropriate language towards students”

🚫 Recommendation

8/100

“Should not be teaching in a police academy with various ethic backgrounds and alternative lifestyle students.”

⚠️ Respect & Climate

12/100

“his mockery of LGBTQ students reflects a troubling absence of respect and empathy”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lecture heavy
  • using inappropriate language towards students
  • appears to derive satisfaction from their grievances

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • mockery of LGBTQ students
  • troubling absence of respect and empathy
  • Should not be teaching in a police academy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Only two detailed recent reviews that agree on quality and character concerns, but the sample is small.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

AJ511 review
AJ521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values