AI Rate Professor

Art

Dan Levenson

ART14 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you , and little structured guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear expectationsUnhelpfulNo rubricsPoor structure
  • The and not helpful in class.
  • Students may struggle because there are .
  • The .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A seems difficult because and .

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course feels hard because expectations, projects, and .

All course difficulty .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review does .

Only one in-person review exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

The because , and lacks rubrics.

All recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

because the student says there are no rubrics or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The review criticizes structure and grading but does not clearly prove a heavy workload.

Format shift

Workload evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The , and did not improve the student's drawing skills.

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The review references planned projects and rubrics rather than exams.

Format shift

All assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review is strongly negative and , and .

Main concern

Students may not know what to improve because projects and .

What students said

“He is not helpful nor clear on what he wants to do in class.”
ART14
“He doesn't have a set of us therefore you don't know what to improve at.”
ART14

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format, proctoring, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is not helpful nor clear on what he wants to do in class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“He is not helpful nor clear on what he wants to do in class.”

⚖️

15/100

“He doesn't have a set of us therefore you don't know what to improve at.”

👎 Recommendation Level

8/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is not helpful nor clear on what he wants to do in class.
  • He didn't improve any of my drawing skills.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • He doesn't have a set of us therefore you don't know what to improve at.
  • I can't tell you what to do I can only tell you what I see.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one old review from 2014, though it is detailed and strongly negative.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values